June 23, 2003
Speaker Albio Sires New Jersey General Assembly House Annex P.O. Box 068 Trenton, NJ 08625-0068
Re: New Jersey Senate Bill 432
Dear Speaker Sires:
The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) represents the aviation interests of over 398,000 members nationwide. On behalf of the more than 9,550 members in New Jersey, AOPA is opposed to any state proposal requiring identity background checks of flight students.
AOPA strongly opposes New Jersey Senate Bill 432 because it is preempted by federal requirements for aviation safety and security. The federal government has taken numerous actions to address aviation security concerns, these combined with recent state general aviation security initiatives, make Senate Bill 432 unnecessary. Passage of this legislation does nothing to enhance security or protect the citizens of your state but would impose an unnecessary restriction and encumbrance on those who seek to learn to fly—an activity regulated and controlled by the federal government.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) issued a legal opinion that state and local governments cannot pass laws regulating pilot licensing. In a letter dated April 10, 2003, TSA Assistant Administrator for Transportation Security Policy Thomas Blank wrote, "It is the position of TSA that federal law impliedly preempts state-imposed aviation security requirements...and that similar legislation being contemplated by other state legislators would likewise be preempted." In a letter dated October 15, 2002, from Federal Aviation Administration Deputy Chief Counsel James Whitlow, also stated that "the qualifications of the person operating aircraft are determined according to federal rules and should not be subject to standards varying from state to state."
AOPA has filed a lawsuit that is pending before the U.S. District Court in Michigan challenging legislation similar to New Jersey Senate Bill 432 that was enacted by the Michigan Legislature. AOPA contends the law is a violation of Article VI, clause 2 (the "supremacy clause") of the U.S. Constitution. Working in concert with AOPA, legislators in Michigan have introduced legislation that would modify their state law and replace the background check requirement with more practicable flight school security recommendations. That bill recently passed committee with unanimous consent.
Since the tragic events of 9/11, the federal government has taken numerous actions related to aviation security. These federal actions include the following:
The identity of a pilot and student pilot is verified using federal procedures already in place.
All pilots and a student pilot, prior to being allowed to operate an aircraft in solo flight without a flight instructor present, must undergo a medical examination by a designated medical examiner and complete FAA form 8500-8 "Application for Airman Medical Certification or Airman Medical and Student Pilot Certification." While this medical examination ensures the applicant does not have any disqualifying medical conditions that would prohibit him/her from safely operating an aircraft, the form does ask for personal information and requests the individual to disclose any non-traffic misdemeanor or felony conviction. Signing the form authorizes the FAA, through the designated state department of motor vehicles, to verify the applicant's information using the National Driver Registry. Any individual providing false or inaccurate information is subject to a fine up to $250,000 or imprisonment.
As previously mentioned, there is an FAA requirement, adopted in October 2002, that requires a pilot to carry a government-issued photo identification along with their pilot certificate when operating an aircraft. This requirement would extend to a student pilot operating an aircraft in solo flight.
Finally, once a student pilot has completed all flight training requirements, that student is subject to a pilot examination conducted by the FAA or a designated pilot examiner. The applicant must complete an FAA Form 8710-1 "Airman Certificate and/or Rating Application form." The pilot examiner is required to verify identify of the applicant using some form of government-issued photo identification.
On March 21, 2003, the New Jersey Domestic Security Preparedness Task Force, with the support of the governor's office, issued a task order outlining enhanced security recommendations at the state's 486 licensed general aviation airports. This task order, which is far more encompassing than what any other state has done, required aircraft stored at an aeronautical facility for more than 24 hours to utilize a two-lock system for securing the aircraft. Aeronautical facilities were additionally required to post signage identifying emergency contact information. Recently, to comply with a recommendation of that task order, the state issued a request for information (RFI) for the installation of a video surveillance system at all public-use airports in New Jersey.
These are measures the state has already implemented, above and beyond any federal requirement, that more than adequately ensure the security of general aviation airports in your state. Additional identity background checks will provide no additional tangible security.
AOPA believes it is important that state security requirements do not undermine the national transportation system. The U.S. Congress has provided the responsibility for regulating the safety and security to the federal government. That is why we request that you hold any further action on Senate Bill 432 until better language can be adopted to address the concerns of the state without unnecessarily duplicating federal efforts.
Andrew V. Cebula Senior Vice President Government and Technical Affairs
June 23, 2003
As the cold weather chills AOPA’s Headquarters in Frederick, many of us are inside generating new resources for flying clubs.
In my house, every Friday night is “Movie Night.” While the movies are rarely educational (I don’t think I learned anything from the Lego Movie), we look forward to the weekly opportunity to spend time together. Why not use the same concept for your Flying Club (with the addition of education, of course)?
AOPA Flying Club Manager Kelby Ferwerda posted the following on the AOPA Flying Club Facebook Page: “Recently I’ve talked with quite a few Flying Clubs about maintaining social activity through the cold winter months. Some clubs host Holliday Parties, others have Potluck Movie Nights. What does your club do to keep members involved during the chilly months?”
VOLUNTEER AT AN AOPA FLY-IN NEAR YOU!
SHARE YOUR PASSION. VOLUNTEER AT AN AOPA FLY-IN. CLICK TO LEARN MORE >>>
VOLUNTEER LOCALLY AT AOPA FLY-IN! CLICK TO LEARN MORE >>>
BE A PART OF THE FLY-IN VOLUNTEER CREW! CLICK TO LEARN MORE >>>