September 22, 2006
AOPA is recommending some additional changes to the FAA's update of airspace protection regulations (Part 77) to protect smaller general aviation airports.
"AOPA generally supports the changes the FAA has proposed, but there are some things that might have a negative affect on GA airports," said Heidi Williams, AOPA director of air traffic services. "We're asking for additional analysis before the rule changes become final."
AOPA's greatest concern is the proposal to expand the "imaginary primary surface" at many GA airports with nonprecision instrument approaches. To over-simplify a bit, this is a protected area surrounding the runway in which no obstructions are allowed.
The problem is that this would decrease the amount of land available for taxiways, aprons, and hangars. It would prevent some smaller airports from making any such improvements because they wouldn't have enough space under the proposed rules.
It could also affect existing structures, because facilities that were acceptable distances away from the runway could possibly be labeled "obstructions" under the new rules.
AOPA called for the FAA to conduct additional analysis before implementing the rule changes. "Simply put, smaller GA airports cannot comply financially with the same standards applicable at larger hub airports," AOPA said. And with the smaller size and slower speeds of the aircraft typically using GA airports, the standards don't need to be the same.
The association also recommended that the FAA reduce its obstruction standard from 499 feet to 400 feet above the surface. That would allow for safer operations for airspace users flying at the 500-foot minimum safe altitude in uncongested areas.
AOPA supported codifying the electromagnetic interference obstruction standards to better protect aviation communication and navigation radio transmissions.
The proposal to add obstruction protection for private-use airports with approved instrument approach procedures also met with AOPA's approval, along with increasing the advance warning period for construction of or alteration to an obstructing structure from 30 to 60 days.
September 22, 2006
A new FAA policy on obstructive sleep apnea that addresses many of the concerns raised by AOPA is scheduled to take effect March 2.
AOPA and the National Business Aviation Association have jointly filed an amicus, or friend of the court, brief in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals as part of the ongoing legal battle over the future of Santa Monica Municipal Airport.
AOPA worked with the flight training industry and FAA to quickly resolve a problem that suddenly put many rating applications on hold.
VOLUNTEER AT AN AOPA FLY-IN NEAR YOU!
SHARE YOUR PASSION. VOLUNTEER AT AN AOPA FLY-IN. CLICK TO LEARN MORE >>>
VOLUNTEER LOCALLY AT AOPA FLY-IN! CLICK TO LEARN MORE >>>
BE A PART OF THE FLY-IN VOLUNTEER CREW! CLICK TO LEARN MORE >>>