December 23, 2009
By Sarah Brown
The FAA’s proposed “one size fits all” approach to airparks and other residential through-the-fence (TTF) operations at public-use airports should be more flexible to accommodate existing TTF deeds and agreements, AOPA told the agency Dec. 18.
Aircraft operations involving homes and businesses on private property that have access to airport taxiways or runways are called “through the fence” operations. In the past, the FAA has approved residential TTF access, but set a very high standard for what constituted an acceptable agreement. In October the FAA invited AOPA and other aviation organizations to comment on a draft letter of guidance that would call for phasing out all existing residential TTF access at public-use airports. The new guidance would apply only to public-use airports that have accepted or are eligible for FAA airport development funding, and would require airport sponsors to negate or modify deeds for existing arrangements, some of them decades old—an action that could burden airports with the costs of litigation.
“We believe that the FAA should recognize that a number of residential TTF agreements already exist and in some cases any changes may be impossible for the airport sponsor to undertake without doing great damage to the airport and local aviation community,” AOPA Vice President of Airports and State Advocacy Greg Pecoraro wrote in a letter to the FAA. Attempts to modify real estate deeds that allow TTF access could result in litigation against the airport, he added.
Earlier in the year, AOPA had urged the FAA airports office to exercise greater flexibility in current enforcement practices.
The new FAA guidance acknowledges no acceptable residential TTF agreements, a statement that AOPA considers a significant departure from the agency’s past policy. It would require sponsors to eliminate TTF access when agreements expire or modify agreements that grant access in perpetuity. Many AOPA members have voiced concerns about a “one size fits all” approach to residential TTF access and the possible elimination of existing operations.
AOPA recognized the FAA’s desire to review new, revised, or renewed TTF access agreements, but recommended the agency work closely with airport sponsors to ensure that existing agreements provide appropriate support to the airport and facilitate its continued operation, instead of eliminating the residential TTF access altogether.
As the cold weather chills AOPA’s Headquarters in Frederick, many of us are inside generating new resources for flying clubs.
In my house, every Friday night is “Movie Night.” While the movies are rarely educational (I don’t think I learned anything from the Lego Movie), we look forward to the weekly opportunity to spend time together. Why not use the same concept for your Flying Club (with the addition of education, of course)?
AOPA Flying Club Manager Kelby Ferwerda posted the following on the AOPA Flying Club Facebook Page: “Recently I’ve talked with quite a few Flying Clubs about maintaining social activity through the cold winter months. Some clubs host Holliday Parties, others have Potluck Movie Nights. What does your club do to keep members involved during the chilly months?”
VOLUNTEER AT AN AOPA FLY-IN NEAR YOU!
SHARE YOUR PASSION. VOLUNTEER AT AN AOPA FLY-IN. CLICK TO LEARN MORE >>>
VOLUNTEER LOCALLY AT AOPA FLY-IN! CLICK TO LEARN MORE >>>
BE A PART OF THE FLY-IN VOLUNTEER CREW! CLICK TO LEARN MORE >>>