February 12, 2009
By Warren D. Morningstar
The Transportation Security Administration’s proposed Large Aircraft Security Program (LASP) took fire at a congressional hearing Feb. 11. Rep. Leonard Boswell (D-Iowa), a pilot and AOPA member, asked AOPA President Craig Fuller about the impact of the security program on general aviation. And Boswell opined on the unnecessary hassles and expenses LASP would impose.
“We don’t see any threats of the kind that are being imagined that produced this regulation,” said Fuller. LASP would impose airline-like security procedures on any aircraft weighing more than 12,500 pounds.
“The 12,500 pound number goes to a certification guideline, not some sort of careful study of what constitutes hazardous, dangerous weapons of destruction,” said Fuller. “We would hope that [TSA] would get into a negotiated regulatory procedure so that we could have a rational discussion about what constitutes a legitimate threat and what simply constitutes a further burden on an already overburdened private aircraft industry.”
Earlier this week, AOPA sent a “ National Pilot Alert” urging all pilots to comment on the TSA security plan prior to the Feb. 27 deadline. Fuller noted that “if one segment of general aviation can be unjustly regulated, then any segment can face the imposition of unfair regulatory burdens.”
During his testimony before the House aviation subcommittee, Fuller pointed out that a King Air 90 would be exempt from the regulation, but a King Air 200 would have to implement airline security procedures. Noting that he had flown both King Airs, Fuller added, “We have an aircraft in our fleet that takes off at 13,870 pounds and carries four-thousand pounds of fuel. There are two of us up front, and four or five in the back. We know exactly who is in that aircraft. It is inconceivable to me that the people who fly that type of aircraft over the weight limit are really going to have to be subjected to a security system and a security program similar to what large commercial aircraft would have to use.”
He said that AOPA and its members were dedicated to making sure that the general aviation fleet and airports were secure. He reminded Congress of AOPA’s Airport Watch program that’s “worked exceedingly well.”
And he noted that aviation leaders and pilots around the country have testified against the TSA program.
Advocacy and Legislation,
Transportation Security Administration,
FAA Financial and Regulatory
AOPA is asking the FAA to withdraw a proposed airworthiness directive that could affect thousands of ECi cylinders.
AOPA is looking to the Michigan Senate for “refinement” of proposals amended unfavorably in last-minute House action.
The General Aviation Pilot Protection Act would allow pilots to use the driver’s license medical standard for noncommercial VFR flights in aircraft weighing up to 6,000 pounds with no more than six seats, as long as they carry fewer than five passengers, fly below 14,000 feet msl, and fly no faster than 250 knots.
AOPA thanks our members for their continued support in protecting the freedom to fly.