March 2, 2010
The Grand Forks, N.D., Air Force Base has generated a draft environmental impact statement (EIS) that would establish restricted airspace for flight by remotely piloted aircraft (RPAs, or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)). The problem is that this new airspace would prevent general aviation aircraft from safely arriving to, or departing from, airports underlying the restricted area.
Military Operations Areas (MOAs) underlying the restricted area have 300-foot-agl floors. Aircraft wanting to use the underlying affected airports would be forced to avoid them. This, in turn, would adversely affect the airport-based businesses, as well as the businesses located near those airports.
In 2008, AOPA first weighed in with concerns. The association expressed concern again about the draft EIS this year in March 1 comments. According to Heidi Williams, AOPA senior director of airspace and modernization, “AOPA urged the Air Force to collaborate with industry groups so that RPA activity could be safely integrated into the airspace instead of creating more restricted airspace designed to segregate military from civilian operations.”
This is the first time that restricted airspace has been proposed for RPV and UAV operations. Should it be established, it would set a precedent that would use restricted airspace to mitigate the “see and avoid” requirements of FAR Part 91.113. Typically, restricted airspace is established for hazardous activities.
The FAA has asked the National Transportation Safety Board to review a judge’s ruling reversing a fine it levied in an unmanned-aircraft case.
The Tucson Soaring Club is trying to grow the sport by training the next generation of glider pilots.
Able Flight has received and $8,000 check from the AOPA Foundation.
AOPA thanks our members for their continued support in protecting the freedom to fly.