MEMBER ALERT: AOPA Pilot Information Center and Member Services will be closed today, Dec. 12, after 2:30 p.m. Eastern, and will reopen Dec. 13 at 8:30 a.m. Eastern. Thank you for your understanding.
July 6, 2012
By Dan Namowitz
A cartoonish yet persuasive illustration in an ancient edition of the FAA’s Instrument Flying Handbook really was worth a thousand words for sending a message.
As a dejected VFR pilot looks on, an instrument pilot walks toward an unseen aircraft, eyes on the sky. In the background of the black-and-white drawing, the sky holds an astonishing, unlikely assortment of clouds. We know which pilot is which because the artist took pains to label one fellow’s luggage “IFR” and the other’s “VFR.” The VFR pilot’s left foot rests atop his suitcase, further emphasizing that he isn’t going anywhere.
Powerful, as a sales pitch for instrument training. And what instrument pilot hasn’t been in the position of the frustrated, frowning fellow for whom flight is forbidden?
What the fellow with the VFR monogram may not realize is that the other pilot may have agonized just as long and hard as he often does about whether to launch into this curious collection of clouds.
Turns out, as he discovers when he too becomes instrument rated, that, there are many occasions when you can’t go. When you can go, the tougher call to make is if you should. Yes, it’s still “a license to learn.”
It’s true that in the instrument environment, there are more options open to the pilot, but those choices pose as many problems as solutions. Assuming that recency of experience is up to date, there’s still the proficiency calculation to be made against the flight conditions to be expected. Is the flight worth it if there’s a risk of diverting to the alternate? Since diverting implies both low weather and extended flying—and perhaps a missed approach somewhere—the pilot’s health and physical stamina deserve some consideration.
Textbook art is necessarily revised as time and technology take their toll on training themes. Color photography of a control tower now occupies the space that the old illustration once filled. Nice—but lacking the perhaps inadvertent abstract complexity of the drawing.
It would have been fun to see a follow-up drawing of the IFR and VFR pilots, set three hours later. (Have at it, artists out there!)
Where would they be? Which would be exiting the frame, head held high, and which would be dejected, wishing to be elsewhere?
Pilot Training and Certification,
Pilot Safety and Skills,
Contemplating IFR flight scenarios for airports like Delta, Utah, is excellent review for any instrument pilot. That's because briefing for a flight into and out of Delta covers bases unlikely to be encountered on your next two-hour tour of your home field approaches.
What’s your heading?” Rare is the student pilot who hasn’t let distraction, or turbulence, spoil a slick stint of steady flying. Then you vow to do a better job next time of keeping track of the messages your instruments are displaying.
Helicopter training is generally very safe. So why do run-on takeoffs and landings feel so wrong?
AOPA thanks our members for their continued support in protecting the freedom to fly.