October 4, 2012
By Dan Namowitz
A federal agency’s plan to study the environmental impact of expanding boundaries of a California marine sanctuary arbitrarily threatens general aviation safety but skirts any requirement to assess the impact on flight operations, AOPA said in a regulatory filing. The association urges members to study the proposal and submit comments by Oct. 10.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) should analyze the impact on general aviation of its proposal to expand the boundaries of the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, even though it is pursuing a rulemaking process that lets the agency avoid that step, AOPA said in formal comments.
In August, AOPA reported that NOAA’s study of expanding the sanctuary boundaries followed the enactment, in February, of a precedent-setting rule that gave NOAA power to regulate airspace. The rule also attached a presumption to some flights below 1,000 feet msl in the vicinity of sanctuaries that wildlife had been disturbed.
In formal comments submitted Oct. 3, AOPA noted that the proposed expansion area “is frequently used to transit north-south around the San Francisco airport Class B airspace. Given the frequent fog and low ceilings in the San Francisco Bay, pilots are often forced to fly at low altitudes—below 2,000 feet agl—in order to comply with FAA regulations. Any attempt to reduce the available airspace in this area will have a substantive impact on the safety, access, and efficiency of general aviation to transit the area.”
Also, jet traffic to and from the airport—which is the nation’s seventh busiest—far exceeds that produced by piston-powered aircraft.
“AOPA urges NOAA to formally declare whether or not the agency plans to expand overflight restrictions if and when the Monterey Bay sanctuary boundaries are modified,” wrote Tom Kramer, AOPA manager of airspace and modernization. “AOPA also urges NOAA to identify and analyze the economic and safety impacts on general aviation caused by both the expanded Marine Sanctuary boundaries and the potential expansion of overflight restrictions.”
AOPA urges members to review the proposal and submit comments by Oct.10, citing docket number NOAA–NOS–2012–0153. Please share your comments with AOPA.
Dan Namowitz is an aviation writer and flight instructor. He has been a pilot since 1985 and an instructor since 1990.
Aircraft Power and Fuel,
A new FAA policy on obstructive sleep apnea that addresses many of the concerns raised by AOPA is scheduled to take effect March 2.
AOPA and the National Business Aviation Association have jointly filed an amicus, or friend of the court, brief in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals as part of the ongoing legal battle over the future of Santa Monica Municipal Airport.
Fourteen aviation organizations have banded together to urge the FAA to take immediate steps to lower barriers to ADS-B equipage.
VOLUNTEER AT AN AOPA FLY-IN NEAR YOU!
SHARE YOUR PASSION. VOLUNTEER AT AN AOPA FLY-IN. CLICK TO LEARN MORE >>>
VOLUNTEER LOCALLY AT AOPA FLY-IN! CLICK TO LEARN MORE >>>
BE A PART OF THE FLY-IN VOLUNTEER CREW! CLICK TO LEARN MORE >>>