October 2, 2003
Assemblyman Herb Conaway, MD Delran Professional Center 8008 Route 130 North, Suite 125 Delran, NJ 08075
Dear Assemblyman Conaway:
The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) represents more than 400,000 members nationwide, 9,580 of whom reside in New Jersey. Our members operate general aviation aircraft from airports throughout New Jersey for business and personal travel. The safe and efficient utilization of airports is critical for our members and the more than $1.3 billion annual economic development general aviation contributes to your state.
Your office recently held a press conference to urge passage of state legislation aimed at preventing certain aircraft from using local airports (Assembly Bill 3886). AOPA is opposed to Assembly Bill 3886. We believe, rather than placing unilateral restrictions on the airport, a much better approach to addressing noise would be through the use of compatible land use and planning.
AOPA understands the concerns of a community relating to aircraft noise. In fact, AOPA and the aviation community promote "fly friendly" concepts to help reduce aircraft noise. We also encourage communities to actively engage in compatible land-use planning to help do their part to prevent such contentious noise issues.
However, Assembly Bill 3886 does not address aircraft noise or compatible land-use planning. Simply put, Assembly Bill 3886 limits airport development—regardless of noise or the size of aircraft operating at the airport.
In order to improve safety, better serve a community, or to meet Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) airport design standards, it is often necessary to increase the width or length of a runway. Without a noise study, Assembly Bill 3886 fails to consider how a specific project actually relates to noise. In some circumstances, increasing a runway's length several hundred feet does not entice any larger aircraft to use an airport, but may actually reduce aircraft noise. Aircraft require a certain amount of runway length to complete their takeoff roll, and by extending one end of the runway, the aircraft is able to gain more altitude before flying over noise-sensitive areas, considerably reducing the ground noise.
Rather than taking a unilateral approach to noise by prohibiting airport development, we strongly suggest a complete approach that addresses the unique nature of individual airports by combining compatible land-use planning and noise studies. No legislation should be enacted that would prohibit an airport from making necessary safety improvements or enhancements.
We would be pleased to provide you any information on FAA noise studies, airport design standards, compatible land-use planning, or AOPA's fly friendly information.
Andrew V. Cebula Senior Vice President Government and Technical Affairs
Cc: Assemblyman John Wisniewski, Chairman, Assembly Transportation Committee
October 2, 2003
The president’s latest budget plan does not include user fees but does offer increased funding for N...
AOPA and six other groups sent a joint letter to House leaders opposing legislation that would make ...
Santa Monica, California, has diverted airport funds, charged excessive and unreasonable landing fee...
VOLUNTEER AT AN AOPA FLY-IN NEAR YOU!
SHARE YOUR PASSION. VOLUNTEER AT AN AOPA FLY-IN. CLICK TO LEARN MORE >>>
VOLUNTEER LOCALLY AT AOPA FLY-IN! CLICK TO LEARN MORE >>>
BE A PART OF THE FLY-IN VOLUNTEER CREW! CLICK TO LEARN MORE >>>