August 27, 2014
By Jim Moore
Stafford Regional Airport in Stafford, Virginia, offers a 5,000-foot runway, reasonable fuel prices, and easy access to Interstate 95, making it a popular destination for pilots. Nearly 16,000 itinerant general aviation operations were logged in 2013, according to FAA data, along with more than 6,000 local operations. The airport also supports military operations, and—like many GA airports—is an important transportation asset.
A proposal to build up to 650 homes on nearly 232 acres south of the airport is incompatible with the long-established airport, AOPA told local officials in an Aug. 19 letter. The Stafford County Board of Supervisors is considering a zoning change that would open the door for residential construction near the airport, a decision that could be made as early as Sept. 16, according to the local newspaper.
AOPA Manager of Airport Policy John Collins noted in his letter that allowing residential development near airports can create many headaches for local officials in decades to come.
“Stafford Regional Airport was deliberately located to ensure that encroachment would not be an issue, yet there continues to be efforts made to develop incompatible land uses around the airport,” Collins wrote. “Developers finish their projects and move on, leaving local government to deal with any resulting issues.”
Those issues typically include complaints from the new residents about noise, dust, and airplane traffic.
“It is our strong belief that development around an airport should consist of more compatible uses that do not place residents under, or adjacent to, the airport traffic pattern thereby creating a potential noise impact,” Collins wrote.
AOPA is not alone in opposing the development plan: State and local aviation officials have both expressed opposition, noting that the development plan would place hundreds of homes directly under the airport’s traffic pattern. County planning officials rejected the development proposal in July. The county is also working on compatible land-use guidelines, and AOPA urged local officials to wait for that study to be finished before making decisions on the use of property near the airport.
AOPA Online Associate Editor Jim Moore joined AOPA in 2011 and is an instrument-rated private pilot who enjoys competition aerobatics.
A new FAA policy on obstructive sleep apnea that addresses many of the concerns raised by AOPA is scheduled to take effect March 2.
AOPA and the National Business Aviation Association have jointly filed an amicus, or friend of the court, brief in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals as part of the ongoing legal battle over the future of Santa Monica Municipal Airport.
AOPA worked with the flight training industry and FAA to quickly resolve a problem that suddenly put many rating applications on hold.
VOLUNTEER AT AN AOPA FLY-IN NEAR YOU!
SHARE YOUR PASSION. VOLUNTEER AT AN AOPA FLY-IN. CLICK TO LEARN MORE >>>
VOLUNTEER LOCALLY AT AOPA FLY-IN! CLICK TO LEARN MORE >>>
BE A PART OF THE FLY-IN VOLUNTEER CREW! CLICK TO LEARN MORE >>>