May 19, 2014
By Dan Namowitz
A U.S. District Court magistrate in Portland, Ore., has recommended that a patent infringement lawsuit against AOPA be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction.
The findings and recommendation in the case brought by SD Holdings in connection with AOPA’s FlyQ Web—a free-to-members online flight planning tool—was issued April 24 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. The recommendation to dismiss was based on the judge’s determination that SD Holdings had not shown why AOPA should be subject to being sued in Oregon. The recommendation now undergoes review by a U.S. District Court judge.
Acosta’s recommendation to dismiss was issued “without prejudice,” which permits the lawsuit to be re-filed in another jurisdiction. He also recommended dismissal without prejudice of AOPA’s motion to recover fees and costs of defending the action, deferring on that matter to the court that ultimately considers the case.
On May 9, SD Holdings filed objections to the dismissal recommendation. AOPA has until May 23 to respond, said AOPA General Counsel Ken Mead.
It was not known when the judge who takes the findings and recommendations under advisement would rule, Mead said.
Dan Namowitz is an aviation writer and flight instructor. He has been a pilot since 1985 and an instructor since 1990.
Greg Pecoraro, AOPA vice president of airports and state advocacy, brought Indiana aviation community members up to date on the association’s initiatives.
Standardized training offered by Cirrus is now accepted by OpenAirplane, thanks to an agreement between the companies.
Here’s a riddle: What job requires a private pilot certificate, but never asks you to leave the ground?
VOLUNTEER AT AN AOPA FLY-IN NEAR YOU!
SHARE YOUR PASSION. VOLUNTEER AT AN AOPA FLY-IN. CLICK TO LEARN MORE >>>
VOLUNTEER LOCALLY AT AOPA FLY-IN! CLICK TO LEARN MORE >>>
BE A PART OF THE FLY-IN VOLUNTEER CREW! CLICK TO LEARN MORE >>>