[Federal Register: December 31, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 250)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 67631-67638]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr31de01-16]

[[Page 67631]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part II

Department of Transportation

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Aviation Administration

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

14 CFR Part 71

Proposed Modification of the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International
Airport Class B Airspace Area; KY; Proposed Rule

[[Page 67632]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2001-10912; Airspace Docket No. 00-AWA-6]
RIN 2120-AA66


Proposed Modification of the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky
International Airport Class B Airspace Area; KY

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to modify the current Cincinnati/Northern
Kentucky International Airport (CVG) Class B airspace area.
Specifically, this action proposes to expand the lateral limits of Area
C; reduce the lateral limits of Area F; eliminate Area G; and raise the
upper limit of the entire Class B airspace area from 8,000 feet mean
sea level (MSL) to 10,000 feet MSL. The FAA is proposing this action to
enhance safety, reduce the potential for midair collisions, and to
improve the management of air traffic operations in the CVG terminal
area. Further, this effort supports the FAA's National Airspace
Redesign project goal of optimizing terminal and enroute airspace areas
to reduce aircraft delays and improve system capacity.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 1, 2002.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the Docket Management
System, U.S. Department of Transportation, Room Plaza 401, 400 Seventh
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001. You must identify both docket
numbers, FAA-2001-10912/Airspace Docket No. 00-AWA-6, at the beginning
of your comments.
    You may also submit comments through the Internet to http://
dms.dot.gov. You may review the public docket containing the proposal,
any comments received, and any final disposition in person in the
Dockets Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Dockets Office (telephone 1-800-647-5527) is on
the plaza level of the NASSIF Building at the Department of
Transportation at the above address.
    An informal docket may also be examined during normal business
hours at the office of the Regional Air Traffic Division, ASO-500,
Federal Aviation Administration, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA
30337.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gallant, Airspace and Rules
Division, ATA-400, Office of Air Traffic Airspace Management, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC
20591; telephone: (202) 267-8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they
may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both airspace docket numbers and be
submitted in triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing
the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must
submit with those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which
the following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket Nos. FAA-2001-
10912/Airspace Docket No. 00-AWA-6.'' The postcard will be date/time
stamped and returned to the commenter. All communications received on
or before the specified closing date for comments will be considered
before taking action on the proposed rule. The proposal contained in
this notice may be changed in light of comments received. All comments
submitted will be available for examination in the Rules Docket both
before and after the closing date for comments. A report summarizing
each substantive public contact with FAA personnel concerned with this
rulemaking will be filed in the docket.

Availability of NPRM's

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at http://dms.dot.gov. Internet users may reach the FAA's web
page at http://www.faa.gov or the Federal Register's web page at http:/
/www.access.gpo.gov/nara for access to recently published rulemaking
documents.
    Any person may also obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a
request to the FAA, Office of Air Traffic Airspace Management, ATA-400,
800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by calling (202)
267-8783. Communications must identify both docket numbers of this
NPRM. Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRM's should call the FAA, Office of Rulemaking, (202) 267-9677, to
request a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

Related Rulemaking Actions

    On May 21, 1970, the FAA published the Designation of Federal
Airways, Controlled Airspace, and Reporting Points Final Rule (35 FR
7782). This rule provided for the establishment of Terminal Control
Airspace (TCA) areas (now known as Class B airspace areas).
    On June 21, 1988, the FAA published the Transponder With Automatic
Altitude Reporting Capability Requirement Final Rule (53 FR 23356).
This rule requires all aircraft to have an altitude encoding
transponder when operating within 30 nautical miles (NM) of any
designated TCA (now known as Class B airspace areas) primary airport
from the surface up to 10,000 feet MSL. This rule excluded those
aircraft that were not originally certificated with an engine-driven
electrical system (or those that have not subsequently been certified
with such a system), balloons, or gliders.
    On October 14, 1988, the FAA published the Terminal Control Area
Classification and Terminal Control Area Pilot and Navigation Equipment
Requirements Final Rule (53 FR 40318). This rule, in part, requires the
pilot-in-command of a civil aircraft operating within a Class B
airspace area to hold at least a private pilot certificate, except for
a student pilot who has received certain documented training.
    On December 17, 1991, the FAA published the Airspace
Reclassification Final Rule (56 FR 65638). This rule discontinued the
use of the term ``Terminal Control Area'' and replaced it with the
designation ``Class B airspace area.'' This change in terminology is
reflected in the remainder of this NPRM.

Petitions

    On April 28, 1999, Sportsman's Market, Inc., (herein after referred
to as ``the petitioner'' or ``Sporty's'') petitioned the FAA for a
modification to the current CVG Class B airspace area by raising the
upper limit and modifying the lateral dimensions of certain sub-areas.
Specifically, the petitioner requested that the FAA raise the upper
limit of the CVG Class B airspace area from 8,000 feet MSL to 8,400
feet MSL, lower the floor of area F and change its

[[Page 67633]]

lateral boundaries on the western side to include part of area G, and
eliminate the rest of area G. The petitioner is of the opinion that the
existing CVG Class B rule causes significant adverse economic effects
to businesses located at Clermont County Airport because the airport is
located under, but not in, an area of Class B airspace. Essentially,
the petitioner contended in part that the 25 NM outer ring impedes
access to Clermont County Airport. However, as the floor of the Class B
airspace area is 6,000 feet MSL in the vicinity of the airport, the
airport is located outside of, and beneath the Class B airspace area.
This configuration provides access to the airport, and businesses
located at the airport, for pilots not desiring to participate in Class
B services.
    On May 12, 1999, the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA)
petitioned the FAA to reconsider the dimension of the current Class B
airspace area. Specifically, AOPA requested that the outer ring of the
airspace be reduced to 20 NM from 25 NM and that the reference point
for the Class B airspace area be centered on the very high frequency
omnidirectional radio range/tactical air navigational aid (VORTAC).
    This rulemaking proposal will address the concerns and substance of
both the Sportsman's Market, Inc., and the AOPA petitions which will be
discussed later in the document. Although AOPA's petition stated that
it was a request for reconsideration, the relief sought by AOPA could
not be accomplished without rulemaking.

Related Rulemaking

    The TCA (now Class B airspace) program was developed to reduce the
potential for midair collision in the congested airspace surrounding
airports with high density air traffic by providing an area wherein all
aircraft are subject to certain operating rules and equipment
requirements.
    The density of traffic and the type of operations being conducted
in the airspace surrounding major terminals increase the probability of
midair collisions. In 1970, an extensive study found that the majority
of midair collisions occurred between a general aviation (GA) aircraft
and an air carriers or military aircraft, and another GA aircraft. The
basic causal factor common to these conflicts was the mix of aircraft
operating under visual flight rules (VFR) and aircraft operating under
instrument flight rules (IFR). Class B airspace areas provide a method
to accommodate the increasing number of IFR and VFR operations. The
regulatory requirements of these airspace areas afford the greatest
protection for the greatest number of people by giving air traffic
control (ATC) increased capability to proved aircraft separation
service, thereby minimizing the mix of controlled and uncontrolled
aircraft.
    The standard configuration of these areas contains three concentric
circles centered on the primary airport extending to 10, 20, and 30 NM,
respectively. The standard vertical limit of these airspace areas
normally should not exceed 10,000 feet above MSL, with the floor
established at the surface in the inner area and at levels appropriate
to the containment of operations in the outer areas. However,
variations if this configuration may be utilized contingent on the
terrain, adjacent regulatory airspace, and factors unique to the
terminal area.
    On November 30, 1998 the FAA published a final rule establishing
the CVG Class B airspace area and revoking the existing Class C
airspace area (63 FR 65972). The new Class B airspace area, implemented
on July 15, 1999, consisted of that airspace within a 25-NM radius of
the CVG International Airport, from the surface or higher up to and
including 8,000 feet above MSL.

Pre-NPRM Public Input

    FAA policy requires a biennial evaluation of existing Class B
airspace areas to ensure that the airspace is configured to enhance
safety and that it is being used efficiently. Based on a need for this
evaluation, an Ad Hoc Committee, representing a cross section of
aviation users, was formed to determine if the dimensions of the CVG
Class B airspace area were meeting the original intent and, if needed,
to develop recommendations for modifications to that airspace. The
Committee held a series of meetings between November 1999 and April
2000.
    As announced in the Federal Register on June 28, 2000 (65 FR 39979)
pre-NPRM informal airspace meetings were held on August 16 and 17,
2000, in Cincinnati, OH, to allow local interested airspace users an
opportunity to present input on planned modifications to the CVG Class
B airspace area and recommendations from the Ad Hoc group. The proposed
modifications discussed in this notice were developed as a result of an
FAA airspace analysis completed in accordance with the agency's policy
to periodically review Class B airspace area designations, and the
recommendations submitted by the Ad Hoc Committee. All comments
received during the informal airspace meetings and the subsequent
comment period were considered and are addressed in this NPRM.

Discussion

    What follows is a discussion of the proposal, analysis of the
comments received during the pre-NPRM stage, and petitions received.

Vertical Dimension Modification

    Seven commenters expressed opposition to the proposed raising of
the CVG Class B airspace area ceiling to 10,000 MSL. Reasons for this
opposition included: the impact on the ability of VFR traffic to fly
over the top of the Class B airspace area (without the need for
supplemental oxygen); the fact that other, apparently busier, Class B
terminals have ceilings below 10,000 feet MSL; and, that air carrier
aircraft operating above 8,000 feet do not need expanded Class B
airspace because the existing Mode C veil requirements and the equipage
of air carrier aircraft with the Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance
System (TCAS) already provide adequate protection.
    The FAA does not agree with these comments. The proposed increase
in the Class B airspace area ceiling would not deny VFR aircraft access
to the airspace between 8,000 feet and 10,000 feet MSL. It is
anticipated that the proposed higher ceiling would not have a
significant adverse impact on VFR traffic based on a finding by the Ad
Hoc Committee that, over a 60-day period, only 70 VFR flight tracks
were observed between 8,000 and 10,000 feet, within 25 miles of CVG.
The FAA believes that the proposed 10,000-foot ceiling would, in fact,
enhance the safety of VFR operations in that stratum as these altitudes
currently contain a significant volume of turbojet-powered air carrier,
general aviation, and cargo aircraft that are climbing rapidly to
10,000 feet to accelerate above 250k; or are descending to 10,000 feet
for speed reduction prior to further descent. While TCAS certainly
enhances safety, it should be noted that the TCAS requirement does not
currently apply to cargo aircraft. A sizeable percentage of CVG's
traffic volume consists of large turbojet-powered cargo aircraft. In a
separate regulatory action, the FAA issued a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking on November 1, 2001, proposing to add collision avoidance
system requirements for certain cargo airplanes (66 FR 55506).
Notwithstanding the outcome of that effort, the higher ceiling would
augment the safety benefits of the Mode C veil and TCAS by ensuring
that ATC has communications with all aircraft operating in that
stratum. This would not only reduce controller

[[Page 67634]]

workload by enabling ATC to ascertain VFR pilot intentions, route of
flight, and destination, but would also allow controllers to offer
assistance to such VFR aircraft in avoiding the heavy concentrations of
traffic transitioning vertically through these altitudes.
    Additionally, although other terminals may have Class B airspace
area ceilings below 10,000 feet, the design of each Class B airspace
area is unique, site specific, and is based on a variety of factors
such as airspace complexity and ATC operational requirements.
Operational requirements were in part factors in the development of
this proposal. Another factor is that the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky
terminal airspace is bounded by Restricted Areas R-3403A and R-3404B on
the west, and the Buckeye military operations area on the east. These
areas limit ATC's flexibility in assigning arrival and departure tracks
in two quadrants of the terminal area. Also, other terminal areas near
CVG have ATC delegated airspace up to 10,000 feet MSL. The proposed
raising of the CVG Class B ceiling would simplify terminal area ATC
procedures by reducing coordination requirements and frequency changes
because, for example the CVG air traffic controller could have the
ability to transfer a departing aircraft directly to the center
controller without a requirement for the pilot to contact the adjacent
terminal facility controller. Indianapolis Air Route Traffic Control
(ARTCC) currently delivers aircraft inbound to CVG at 11,000 feet MSL
via one of four arrival transition areas (ATA) located northwest,
northeast, southeast, or southwest of the airport. Once in the terminal
area, these airport arrivals are generally descended to 10,000 feet;
while the departures normally climb up to 8,000 or 9,000 feet. When the
departures have been laterally separated from the arrivals by ATC, the
departures are issued a climb to 13,000 feet and handed off to
Indianapolis ARTCC. Concurrently, once this lateral separation is
established, the arrivals are given a descent to a lower altitude. This
generally cannot occur until the arrivals are abeam the airport, on a
downwind leg. With the existing 8,000 feet ceiling, traffic arriving at
CVG often must fly 30-35 NM outside of the Class B airspace, depending
on the runway in use and the direction of arrival into the terminal
area. For example, when the airport is using Runways 18L and 18R for
landings (approximately 86 percent of the time), aircraft arriving
through the southeast or southwest ATAs are required to travel about 30
flying miles at 10,000 feet or 11,000 feet, above the existing CVG
Class B airspace area, before reaching a point abeam the airport where
they can be descended into the Class B airspace area. A similar
situation exists for aircraft arriving through the northwest and
northeast ATAs when Runways 36L and 36R are in use.
    The Ad Hoc Committee did not reach a consensus regarding the issue
of raising the Class B airspace area ceiling to 10,000 feet MSL.
However, the FAA believes that the airspace analysis supports the
increase and is including the proposal in this notice to obtain
additional comment on the matter before any final decision is made. If
the FAA keeps the Class B ceiling at a lower altitude (i.e., 8,000 feet
MSL), more departing aircraft will be required to level off prior to
reaching an altitude where they can accelerate above 250 knots. This is
not cost effective and does not contribute to system efficiency.
Raising the altitude to 10,000 feet MSL decreases the chances that ATC
will need to require a departing aircraft to level off prior to cruise
altitude. The FAA believes that raising the altitude of the area would
lessen economic impacts and increase system efficiency for aircraft
operating into and out of CVG. Raising the Class B ceiling to 8,400
feet MSL as requested by Sporty's, would not provide sufficient Class B
airspace needed to contain those arriving aircraft that must currently
travel a significant distance above Class B airspace as discussed
above. For the original establishment of the CVG Class B airspace area,
the FAA's analysis indicated that an 8,000 feet MSL ceiling would be
sufficient. Operational experience with this configuration since the
July 15, 1999 implementation indicates that a 10,000 feet MSL ceiling
would benefit safety and efficiency in the CVG terminal area.

Lateral Dimension Modification

    Several commenters contended that the 25-NM ring of the Class B
airspace area is excessively large and that the outer ring of the Class
B airspace area should be reduced to 20 NM. Conversely, two commenters
expressed concern about whether the proposed reduction of the outer
ring from 25 miles to 20 miles would still ensure that aircraft are
contained within the Class B airspace area throughout all phases of the
approach.
    In this action, the FAA is proposing to reduce the limit of the
outer ring in the east and west quadrants (i.e., portions of area G and
area F) to 20 NM. During the rulemaking process to revoke the Class C
airspace area and implement a Class B airspace area at CVG, several
commenters recommended reducing the size of the proposed area to a 15-
to 20-mile radius rather than at that time the proposed 25-mile radius.
At that time, the FAA concluded that, because of the high volume of
arrival and departure aircraft at the primary airport, it was necessary
to use the area between 20-25 NM, including areas F and G. The Class B
airspace area became effective on July 15, 1999 (64 FR 17934) with the
outer ring set at 25 NM. After the implementation of the Class B
airspace area, modifications were made to local ATC procedures to
improve the management of aircraft operations into and out of CVG. Over
the past 3 years, the FAA has been studying aircraft operations in the
CVG terminal area to assess airspace use and air traffic control
procedures and requirements, particularly in light of the conversion of
CVG terminal airspace from Class C to Class B. As part of this effort,
FAA representatives met on numerous occasions with local pilots, user
groups, and airport officials seeking feedback on the effectiveness of
the terminal area airspace configuration. These feedback sessions,
along with the internal ongoing review, were conducted to determine
whether the Class B airspace area was configured to ensure the most
efficient use of airspace, and to ensure the safe, orderly, and
expeditious flow of traffic. Based on its review, the FAA determined
that, based on procedural changes, arrival aircraft are not now being
directed into the airspace to the east and west of CVG. Further,
operational experience also revealed that departure aircraft on the
east and west sides have already reached an altitude between 11,000 to
12,000 feet MSL by the time they pass the 20 NM Class B airspace ring.
Another factor that the FAA evaluated is the proximity to special use
airspace to the CVG Class B airspace area. On the west side, restricted
areas R-3404A and B are situated less than 10 NM west of the current 25
NM Class B boundary. This allows only a small corridor for VFR pilots
transiting north and south between the restricted areas and the CVG
Class B airspace area who elect not to participate in Class B services.
Reducing the outer ring to 20 NM in this area would provide additional
airspace for pilots transiting north and south or choosing to
circumnavigate the Class B area. Similarly, on the east side, the
Buckeye military operations area (MOA) is located approximately 10 NM
east of the Class B airspace boundary. Reducing the outer ring to 20 NM
in this area would also provide VFR aircraft with a

[[Page 67635]]

wider corridor to circumnavigate the Class B airspace area and remain
clear of the Buckeye MOA. Additionally, the airspace analysis revealed
that the current airspace north and south of CVG is necessary to
accommodate arrival traffic and provide needed airspace for
simultaneous parallel ILS approaches. A third runway is scheduled to
become operational at CVG in 2005. When operational, the third runway
is expected to provide a 26% capacity improvement at CVG through the
introduction of simultaneous triple ILS approaches.
    In their petitions, both Sporty's and AOPA requested adjustments to
the outer limits of the CVG Class B airspace area. The retention of the
outer ring at 25 NM on the north and south sides will ensure that
sufficient Class B airspace is available to contain those procedures
and accommodate the projected increase in traffic at CVG. Based on the
operational experience gained since the inception of the Class B
airspace area and the recommendations of the Ad Hoc committee, the FAA
believes that Class B airspace is not required between the 20 NM and 25
NM rings to the east and west of CVG and that the modification of the
outer ring as described above would enhance the efficient use of
airspace without adversely affecting safety.

Other Comments

    One commenter suggested that a corridor be developed through the
Class B airspace area, within which the Mode C veil requirement would
not apply.
    The FAA does not have the latitude to exclude areas within a 30-NM
radius of the Class B airspace primary airport from the requirement for
an altitude encoding transponder (this area is commonly referred to as
the ``Mode C Veil''). The Mode C veil requirement originated from
several Congressional mandates (Public Law 100-202, etc.) that the FAA
issue regulations requiring that all aircraft operating in certain
terminal airspace areas be equipped with a transponder with Mode C. On
June 21, 1988, the FAA issued a rule requiring that, as of July 1,
1989, all aircraft, with certain exceptions, operating within 30 miles
of any designated terminal control area (now Class B airspace area)
primary airport must be equipped with a transponder with Mode C (53 FR
23368). However, the commenter is advised that FAA included provisions
in 14 CFR 91.215(d) to allow for ATC-authorized deviations from this
requirement, under certain conditions, to accommodate non-transponder
operations to, from, or within the Mode C veil.
    One commenter stated that the FAA should use physical features
instead of radials to describe the boundaries of the Class B airspace
area. In its petition, AOPA requested that the reference point for the
Class B airspace area be centered on the Cincinnati VORTAC as opposed
to the airport.
    The Class B airspace area description proposed in this notice is
based on the recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee and represents
only minor changes to the existing format used to describe the lateral
dimensions of the area. The current and proposed boundary descriptions
consist of a mix of prominent landmarks, latitude/longitude
coordinates, radials from the Cincinnati VORTAC, and arcs of the
airport. Considering the availability of landmarks in the area, the FAA
believes that this mix of descriptors should effectively assist pilots
in identifying the lateral boundaries of the Class B airspace area. The
FAA will consider the addition of a very high frequency omnidirectional
radio range radial/Distance Measuring Equipment (DME) cross-reference
table to the Cincinnati terminal area chart, similar to the tables
found on the Los Angeles and San Diego terminal area charts, to define
various points of the CVG Class B airspace area. This table would
provide radial/DME references to further assist pilots in navigating in
the Cincinnati area.
    Two commenters recommended that the FAA establish VFR corridors
through the Class B airspace area and one commenter recommended the
establishment of a VFR/IFR corridor to facilitate transiting the
Cincinnati area.
    The FAA does not agree with the recommendation to establish VFR
corridors because the establishment of such corridors could interfere
with safe and efficient operations in the CVG Class B airspace area.
Low altitude VFR transition routes have been published on the reverse
side of the Cincinnati VFR Terminal area chart to assist pilots since
the original inception of the Class B airspace area. If the proposed
modifications are implemented, the transition routes will basically
remain the same except for minor adjustments to the suggested altitudes
in Area D, to the north and south of the airport. Regarding the
recommendation to establish a VFR/IFR corridor, there would be no
operational advantage to be gained over the services currently provided
by ATC to assist both VFR and IFR overflights in avoiding the high
concentrations of IFR traffic.

The Proposal

    The FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 by modifying the CVG Class
B airspace area. Specifically, this action (depicted on the attached
chart) proposes to expand the lateral limits of Area C to the north and
south of the airport; modify the lateral limits of Area F on the east
and west sides of the Class B area; eliminate Area G; and raise the
upper limit of the Class B airspace area from 8,000 feet MSL to 10,000
feet MSL. These modifications would better accommodate nonparticipating
aircraft operations by providing both easier access to satellite
airports, and additional airspace on the east and west sides for
aircraft desiring to circumnavigate the CVG Class B airspace area. In
addition, these modifications would improve the management of air
traffic operations in the CVG terminal area, and enhance safety by
extending Class B airspace protection to a significant volume of
aircraft currently operating between 8,000 feet MSL and 10,000 feet
MSL. This proposed action supports various efforts to enhance the
efficiency and capacity of the National Airspace System, such as the
National Airspace Redesign and the Operational Evolution Plan.
    Area A and Area B. The FAA is not proposing any changes to the
lateral dimensions of Area A or Area B.
    Area C. The FAA proposes to modify Area C by expanding the
boundaries of Area C to the north and south of the airport. This
modification would incorporate into Area C, two segments of the Class B
airspace area that are currently contained within Area D. Specifically,
to the north of the airport, the FAA proposes to extend Area C
northward to incorporate that part of Area D airspace that lies west of
the extended instrument landing system (ILS) localizer course for
Runway 18L, between the 20- and 25-NM arcs of the airport. To the south
of the airport, the FAA proposes to extend Area C southward to
incorporate that portion of Area D that lies west of the extended ILS
localizer course for Runway 36R, between the 20- and 25-NM arcs of the
airport. The effect of extending Area C as described, would be to lower
the floor of Class B airspace in the affected segments from the current
3,500 feet MSL to 3,000 feet MSL. The reason for this change is to
provide additional airspace needed to ensure that the required 1,000
feet vertical separation is maintained while multiple aircraft are
being radar vectored for simultaneous ILS approaches.
    Area D. The FAA proposes to modify Area D to the north and south of
the airport as a result of the expansion of Area C as described above.
This modification would reduce the size of

[[Page 67636]]

the Area D segments located to the north and south of the airport. The
Area D segments located to the east and west of the airport would not
be changed by this proposal.
    Area E. No changes are proposed to the lateral dimensions of Area
E.
    Area F. The FAA proposes to reduce the overall size of Area F by
eliminating certain portions of Area F, between 20 NM and 25 NM,
located to the west and east of the airport. On the west side, the
portion of Area F that lies within an area bounded by the 20- and 25-NM
arcs of the airport, and between the CVG VORTAC 247 deg. radial
clockwise to the CVG VORTAC 297 deg. radial, would be eliminated. To
the east of the airport, the portion of Area F bounded by the 20- and
25-NM arcs of the airport, and between the CVG VORTAC 056 deg. radial
clockwise to the CVG VORTAC 116 deg. radial, would also be eliminated.
The FAA proposes to further modify Area F by incorporating two small
sections of Area G. Specifically, Area F would absorb small segments of
airspace in the western-most point and the southern tip of the existing
Area G. The proposed Area F modifications would benefit
nonparticipating VFR operations by accommodating easier access to
satellite airports and by providing a larger area for circumnavigation
between the Class B airspace area and Restricted Area R-3403 on the
west side; and between the Class B airspace area and the Buckeye
military operations area to the east of the CVG terminal area.
    Area G. The FAA proposes to eliminate most of Area G (i.e., that
airspace from 6,000 feet MSL to and including 8,000 feet MSL, along the
eastern edge of the Class B airspace area), except for two small
sections at the western-most and southern-most points in Area G that
would be incorporated into Area F, as described above. Three years ago,
the FAA believed that it was necessary to have Class B airspace out to
25 NM to the west and to the east of CVG. The FAA believed this was
necessary in order to accommodate departure profiles and to provide for
the optimum use of the airspace. After two years of operational
experience, the FAA now believes that the proposed cutouts to the east
and to the west will adequately accommodate the departure profiles.
This modification would better accommodate GA operations at satellite
airports and allow easier access/transition by nonparticipating
aircraft. This would also provide aircraft not desiring to participate
in Class B services with additional airspace for circumnavigation of
the Class B airspace area on the east side.
    The FAA further proposes to raise the upper limit of the Class B
airspace area from the current 8,000 feet MSL to 10,000 feet MSL.
    This proposal to modify the CVG Class B airspace area would enhance
safety and improve the flow of air traffic in the CVG terminal area. In
addition, it would better accommodate VFR operations by improving
access to satellite airports and providing additional airspace for
circumnavigation of the CVG Class B airspace area. The modifications
proposed in this notice support the National Airspace Redesign project
and the FAA's Operational Evolution Plan.
    The coordinates for this airspace docket are based on North
American Datum 83. Class B airspace areas are published in paragraph
3000 of FAA Order 7400.9J, dated August 31, 2001, and effective
September 16, 2001, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
section 71.1. The Class B airspace area listed in this document would
be published subsequently in the Order.

Regulatory Evaluation Summary

    Changes to Federal regulations must undergo several economic
analyses. First, Executive Order 12866 directs each Federal agency
proposing or adopting a regulation to first make a reasoned
determination that the benefits of the intended regulation justify its
costs. Second, the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 requires agencies
to analyze the economic impact of regulatory changes on small entities.
Third, the Trade Agreements Act prohibits agencies from setting
standards that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of
the United States. In developing U.S. standards, this act requires
agencies to consider international standards, and use them where
appropriate as the basis of U.S. standards. Fourth, the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires agencies to prepare a written
assessment of the costs and benefits and other effects of proposed and
final rules. An assessment must be prepared only for rules that impose
a Federal mandate on State, local or tribal governments, or on the
private sector, likely to result in a total expenditure of $100 million
or more in any one year (adjusted for inflation.)
    In conducting these analyses, FAA has determined: (1) This rule has
benefits that justify its costs. This rulemaking does not impose costs
sufficient to be considered ``significant'' under the economic
standards for significance under Executive Order 12866 or under DOT's
Regulatory Policies and Procedures. Due to public interest, however, it
is considered significant under the Executive Order and DOT policy. (2)
This rule would not have a significant impact on a substantial number
of small entities. (3) This rule has no affect on any trade-sensitive
activity. (4) This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on state,
local, or tribal governments, or on the private sector.
    The proposed rule would expand the lateral limits of Area C; reduce
the lateral limits of Area F; eliminate Area G; and raise the upper
limit of the entire Class B airspace area from 8,000 feet MSL to 10,000
feet MSL.
    This NPRM would enhance safety in the CVG terminal area and would
result in a more efficient use of the airspace. Additionally, this NPRM
would generate cost savings to nonparticipating VFR operations by
providing a larger area for circumnavigation. Thus, the FAA has
determined that this proposed rule would be cost-beneficial.

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Determination

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 establishes ``as a principle
of regulatory issuance that agencies shall endeavor, consistent with
the objective of the rule and of applicable statutes, to fit regulatory
and informational requirements to the scale of the business,
organizations, and governmental jurisdictions subject to regulation.''
To achieve that principle, the Act requires agencies to solicit and
consider flexible regulatory proposals and to explain the rationale for
their actions. The Act covers a wide-range of small entities, including
small businesses, not-for-profit organizations and small governmental
jurisdictions.
    Agencies must perform a review to determine whether a proposed or
final rule would have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. If the determination is that it would, the
agency must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis (RFA) as
described in the Act.
    However, if an agency determines that a proposed or final rule is
not expected to have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, section 605(b) of the 1980 act provides that
the head of the agency may so certify and an RFA is not required. The
certification must include a statement providing the factual basis for
this determination, and the reasoning should be clear.
    In view of the minimal cost impact of the rule, the FAA has
determined that this proposed rule would not have significant economic
impact on a

[[Page 67637]]

substantial number of small entities. Consequently, the FAA certifies
that the rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. The FAA solicits comments from
affected entities with respect to this finding and determination.

International Trade Impact Assessment

    The Trade Agreement Act of 1979 prohibits Federal agencies from
engaging in any standards or related activities that create unnecessary
obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United States. Legitimate
domestic objectives, such as safety, are not considered unnecessary
obstacles. The statute also requires consideration of international
standards and where appropriate, that they be the basis for U.S.
standards.
    In accordance with the above statute, the FAA has assessed the
potential effect of this proposed rule and has determined that it would
have only a domestic impact and therefore create no obstacles to the
foreign commerce of the United States.

Unfunded Mandates Assessment

    Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (the Act),
enacted as Public Law 104-4 on March 22, 1995, requires each Federal
agency, to the extent permitted by law, to prepare a written assessment
of the effects of any Federal mandate in a proposed or final agency
rule that may result in the expenditure of $100 million or more (when
adjusted annually for inflation) in any one year by State, local, and
tribal governments in the aggregate, or by the private sector. Section
204(a) of the Act, 2 U.S.C. 1534(a), requires the Federal agency to
develop an effective process to permit timely input by elected officers
(or their designees) of State, local, and tribal governments on a
proposed ``significant intergovernmental mandate.'' A ``significant
intergovernmental mandate'' under the Act is any provision in a Federal
agency regulation that would impose an enforceable duty upon State,
local, and tribal governments in the aggregate of $100 million
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any one year. Section 203 of the
Act, 2 U.S.C. 1533, which supplements section 204(a), provides that,
before establishing any regulatory requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect small governments, the agency shall
have developed a plan which, among other things, must provide for
notice to potentially affected small governments, if any, and for a
meaningful and timely opportunity for these small governments to
provide input in the development of regulatory proposals.
    This proposed rule does not contain any Federal intergovernmental
or private sector mandates. Therefore, the requirements of Title II of
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 do not apply.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-
511), there are no requirements for information collection associated
with this proposed rule.

Conclusion

    In view of the minimal or zero cost of compliance of the proposed
rule and the enhancements to operational efficiency that do not reduce
aviation safety, the FAA has determined that the proposed rule would be
cost-beneficial.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND
CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIRWAYS; ROUTES, AND REPORTING POINTS

    1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec. 71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9J, Airspace Designations and
reporting Points, dated August 31, 2001, and effective September 16,
2001, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 3000--Subpart B--Class B Airspace.

* * * * *

ASO KY B  Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport, KY
[Revised]

Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport (Primary Airport)
    (Lat. 39 deg.02'46"N., long. 84 deg.39'44" W.)
Cincinnati VORTAC (CVG)
    (Lat. 39 deg.00'57" N., long. 84 deg.42'12" W.)

Boundaries

    Area A. That airspace extending upward from the surface to and
including 10,000 feet MSL within a radius of 5 miles from the
Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport.
    Area B. That airspace extending upward from 2,100 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within the area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 5-mile arc of the airport and
the Kentucky bank of the Ohio River northeast of the airport; thence
northeast along the Kentucky bank of the Ohio River to the 10-mile
arc of the airport; thence clockwise along the 10-mile arc to the
Kentucky bank of the Ohio River southwest of the airport; thence
north along the Kentucky bank of the Ohio River to the Indiana-Ohio
State line (long. 84 deg.49'00" W); thence north along the State
line to Interstate 275; thence northeast along Interstate 275 to
Interstate 74; thence east along Interstate 74 to the CVG VORTAC
040 deg. radial; thence southwest along the CVG VORTAC 040 deg.
radial to the 5-mile arc of the airport; thence counterclockwise on
the 5-mile arc to the point of beginning.
    Area C. That airspace extending upward from 3,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within the area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of Interstate 275 and the Indiana-Ohio
State line (long. 84 deg.49'00" W); thence north along the Indiana-
Ohio State line, to intersect the 20-mile arc of the airport; thence
clockwise along the 20-mile arc of the airport to intersect the
extended Runway 18L ILS localizer course; then south along the
extended Runway 18L ILS localizer course to the 15-mile arc of the
airport; thence clockwise on the 15-mile arc to long. 84 deg.30'00"
W.; thence south along long. 84 deg.30'00" W. to the 10-mile arc of
the airport; thence clockwise on the 10-mile arc to the Kentucky
bank of the Ohio River; thence west along the Kentucky bank the Ohio
River to the 5-mile arc of the airport; thence counterclockwise
along the 5-mile arc to the CVG VORTAC 040 deg. radial; thence
northeast along the CVG VORTAC 040 deg. radial to Interstate 74;
thence west along Interstate 74 to Interstate 275; thence west along
Interstate 275 to the point of beginning. That airspace beginning at
the intersection of the 10-mile arc southeast of the airport and
long. 84 deg.30'00" W.; thence south along long. 84 deg.30'00" W. to
the 15-mile arc of the airport; thence clockwise along the 15-mile
arc to intersect the Runway 36R ILS localizer course; thence south
along the Runway 36R ILS localizer course to the 20-mile arc of the
airport, thence clockwise along the 20-mile arc to long.
84 deg.49'00" W.; thence north along long. 84 deg.49'00" W. to the
Kentucky bank of the Ohio River; thence north along the Kentucky
bank of the Ohio River to the 10-mile arc of the airport; thence
counterclockwise along the 10-mile arc to the point of beginning.
    Area D. That airspace extending upward from 3,500 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within the area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of lat. 39 deg.09'18" N. and the 10-
mile arc northeast of the airport; thence east to the 15-mile arc of
the airport; thence clockwise on the 15-mile arc to lat.
38 deg.56'15" N.; thence west along lat. 38 deg.56'15" N. to
intersect the 10-mile arc of the airport; thence counterclockwise
along the 10-mile arc to the point of beginning.

[[Page 67638]]

That airspace beginning at the intersection of the Kentucky bank of
the Ohio River and lat. 38 deg.56'15" N. southwest of the airport;
thence west along lat. 38 deg.56'15" N. to the 15-mile arc of the
airport; thence clockwise along the 15-mile arc to lat.
39 deg.09'18" N.; thence east along lat. 39 deg.09'18" N. to the
Indiana-Ohio State line; thence South along the Indiana-Ohio State
line to the Kentucky bank of the Ohio River; thence south along the
Kentucky bank of the Ohio River to point of beginning. That airspace
beginning at the intersection of the 15-mile arc of the airport and
the ILS Runway 18L localizer course; thence north along the extended
ILS Runway 18L localizer course to the 20-mile arc of the airport;
thence clockwise along the 20-mile arc to long. 84 deg.30'00" W.;
thence south along long. 84 deg.30'00" W. to the 15-mile arc of the
airport; thence counterclockwise along the 15-mile arc to the point
of beginning. That airspace beginning at the intersection of the 15-
mile arc south of the airport and the ILS Runway 36R localizer
course; thence south along the extended ILS Runway 36R localizer to
the 20-mile arc of the airport; thence counterclockwise along the
20-mile arc to long. 84 deg.30'00" W.; thence north along long.
84 deg.30'00" W. to the 15-mile arc of the airport; thence clockwise
along the 15-mile arc to the point of beginning.
    Area E. That airspace extending upward from 4,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within the area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 20-mile arc of the airport and
the Indiana-Ohio State line; thence north along the Indiana-Ohio
State line to the 25-mile arc of the airport; thence clockwise along
the 25-mile arc to long. 84 deg.30'00" W.; thence south along long.
84 deg.30'00" W. to the 20-mile arc of the airport; thence
counterclockwise on the 20-mile arc to the point of beginning. That
airspace beginning at the intersection of the 20-mile arc of the
airport and long. 84 deg.30'00" W. southeast of the airport; thence
south along long. 84 deg.30'00" W. to the 25-mile arc of the
airport; thence clockwise along the 25-mile arc to long.
84 deg.49'00" W.; thence north along long. 84 deg.49'00" W. to the
20-mile arc of the airport; thence counterclockwise along the 20-
mile arc to the point of beginning.
    Area F. That airspace extending upward from 5,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within the area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 25-mile arc north of the
airport and long. 84 deg.30'00" W.; thence clockwise along the 25-
mile arc of the airport to the CVG VORTAC 056 deg. radial; thence
southwest along the CVG VORTAC 056 deg. radial to the 20-mile arc of
the airport; thence clockwise along the 20-mile arc of the airport
to the CVG VORTAC 116 deg. radial; thence southeast along the CVG
VORTAC 116 deg. radial to the 25-mile arc of the airport; thence
clockwise along the 25-mile arc of the airport to long.
84 deg.30'00" W. south of the airport; thence north along long.
84 deg.30'00" W. to the intersection of the 10-mile arc of the
airport and lat. 38 deg.56'15" N.; thence east along lat.
38 deg.56'15" N. to the 15-mile arc of the airport; thence clockwise
along the 15-mile arc of the airport to lat. 39 deg.09'18" N.;
thence west along lat. 39 deg.09'18" N. to the intersection of the
10-mile arc of the airport and long. 84 deg.30'00" W; thence north
along long. 84 deg.30'00" W. to the point of beginning. That
airspace beginning at the intersection of the 25-mile arc of the
airport and the Indiana-Ohio State line; thence counterclockwise
along the 25-mile arc to the CVG VORTAC 297 deg. radial; thence
southeast along the CVG VORTAC 297 deg. radial to the 20-mile arc of
the airport; thence counterclockwise along the 20-mile arc of the
airport to the CVG VORTAC 247 deg. radial; thence southwest along
the CVG VORTAC 247 deg. radial to the 25-mile arc of the airport;
thence counterclockwise along the 25-arc of the airport to long.
84 deg.49'00" W. south of the airport; thence north along long.
84 deg.49'00" W. to the Kentucky bank of the Ohio River; thence
north along the Kentucky bank of the Ohio River to lat.
38 deg.56'15" N.; thence west along lat. 38 deg.56'15" N. to the 15-
mile arc of the airport; thence clockwise on the 15-mile arc of the
airport to lat. 39 deg.09'18" N.; thence east along lat.
39 deg.09'18" N. to the Indiana-Ohio State line; thence north along
the Indiana-Ohio State line to the point of beginning.
    Area G. [Revoked]
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 21, 2001.
Reginald C. Matthews,
Manager, Airspace and Rules Division.
[FR Doc. 01-32007 Filed 12-21-01; 3:43 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P