October 13, 2005
The FAA is taking AOPA's suggestion to talk to the users about perceived problems with the MU-2 twin turboprop. Last month the agency proposed yet another review of the aircraft - that following congressional pressure after two crashes in Colorado.
But AOPA argued that so far the evidence seemed to suggest a training or maintenance issue, not a problem with the aircraft itself. The association suggested the agency talk to owners and operators and volunteered to host such forums.
The FAA is now in the process of holding select user meetings; the first was last week with MU-2 training providers. The agency also will meet next week with AOPA, an MU-2 owners group, and other associations to discuss potential solutions to the MU-2 accident rate and to identify best practices for the owner-flown MU-2s. The agency also has sent a letter to all MU-2 owners and operators suggesting they consider type-specific training for both pilots and mechanics. The FAA noted that "performance expectations and control techniques common in other turboprop twins do not necessarily transfer to flying the MU-2."
Because the MU-2 uses spoilerons rather than ailerons for roll control, engine-out technique is somewhat different than it is for most twin-engine aircraft. See " Used Turbine Review: Mitsubishi MU-2s."
October 13, 2005
AOPA expressed concern in a meeting with town officials from East Hampton, New York, that restrictions proposed to curb airport noise “overwhelmingly” generated by transient commercial flights would unfairly burden traditional airport users.
February 27, 2015 ePilot Training Tip: Awake to a hazard
February 27, 2015 Medical reform bills add IFR; Hawaii from above
VOLUNTEER AT AN AOPA FLY-IN NEAR YOU!
SHARE YOUR PASSION. VOLUNTEER AT AN AOPA FLY-IN. CLICK TO LEARN MORE >>>
VOLUNTEER LOCALLY AT AOPA FLY-IN! CLICK TO LEARN MORE >>>
BE A PART OF THE FLY-IN VOLUNTEER CREW! CLICK TO LEARN MORE >>>