There are a number of reasons for wanting to fly above clouds or haze, but the desire to avoid adverse weather tops the list. It's often smoother above a lower layer of clouds; the visibility is often better; and upcoming rainshowers, thunderstorms, and other cloud build-ups are more easily seen.
But on-top operations can go bad — very, very bad if you have no instrument rating, little time on the gauges, or limited weather flying experience. The Federal Aviation Regulations let us fly VFR on top of a layer of clouds as long as we can make cloud-free climbs and descents to cruise altitude. Sometimes it doesn't work out that way.
Here are a few common weather scenarios that illustrate the point.
How can you avoid being trapped on top or being unwittingly forced into flying in IMC? Avoidance begins with a good preflight weather briefing. Pay close attention to the terminal forecasts for mention of any cloud layers, as well as their nature. A route-long forecast of 3,000 scattered, 10,000 broken sounds like a good deal; 3,000 scattered, 6,000 broken, 10,000 overcast sounds a lot like a front's nearby.
At the very least, the VFR-only pilot should make sure that surface reports and forecasts indicate good VFR below the lowest cloud layers and that those layers never extend to the magic, 1,000-foot VFR ceiling minimum. If you have to make an emergency descent on instruments, you certainly want to make sure you can break out into VFR conditions below.
Area forecasts will also mention cloud layers, as well as a number of other critical forecast elements. For example, ahead of an August warm front, the area forecast for Illinois mentioned "AGL 40 SCT-BKN LYRD 150." Decoded, this means that a scattered to broken cloud base of 4,000 feet agl is forecast, with cloud layers to 15,000 feet msl.
VFR-only pilots, how does that sound to you? It should be a warning that something is cooking. Trying to top that scattered to broken layer doesn't sound like a particularly good idea, for the reasons mentioned earlier. Flight below the clouds sounds in order, terrain and obstacles permitting.
Instrument-rated pilots, would you fly into such a forecast? Maybe. Maybe not, if you read the rest of the forecast. It goes: "OVR W CNTRL IL WDLY SCT RW/TRW PSBLY SVR SPRDG OVER RMDR STATE BY 18Z. CB TOPS ABV 450. OTLK...MVFR CIG RW/TRW NRN IL...VFR TRW SRN IL." With plenty of weather flying experience, radar, lightning detection equipment, turbine power, helpful controllers, and a few escape paths, the instrument-rated pilot may be able to escape Illinois by artfully dodging build-ups and storms. But VFR on top? Don't count on it.
Pireps, if they are current, are perhaps the most valuable source of information on cloud bases and tops. Too bad pilots don't give more of them.
Naturally, you should be talking to Flight Watch on 122.0 MHz for weather updates. The more marginal the weather and the denser the lower layer of clouds, the more often you should be checking for late-breaking surface observations, terminal forecast amendments, and pireps. The moment you sense that lower layer becoming an undercast, start asking Flight Watch for the nearest airports with ceilings above your current cruising altitude.
What's the best weather setup for hassle-free VFR-on-top flying? As we all know, there are no guarantees when it comes to forecasting, but here are four fairly conservative situations that should keep you out of trouble:
Let's say the worst has happened. You are a VFR-only pilot, you've been on top, but now you're in a bind. You're suddenly faced with, or in, clouds. What to do?
Clear-cut answers are difficult. If it's a convective situation, the terrain allows, and the cloud bases are high enough, a descent makes sense. As a general rule, don't allow yourself to be forced into a climb. Sooner or later, you'll have to descend, perhaps back down through a thunderstorm.
Reversing course is often a good option, followed by a diversion to an airport having VFR conditions. If you're lucky enough to have holes large enough in the cloud layer below, then by all means spiral on down — if terrain, obstacles, and weather will let you. In other words, you don't want to descend to an altitude closer to the surface if you don't have safe visibility. Descending for its own sake is out. On or off instruments, altitude is nearly always your friend.
Of course, all of this should be done with the help of an air traffic control facility. VFR into IFR is a serious situation for the non- instrument rated and qualifies as an emergency. Don't be afraid to climb, confess, and comply with ATC's suggestions for getting out of the mess.
By now, the value of an instrument rating should be obvious. Yes, private and commercial pilot certification standards require you to demonstrate proficiency in flying on instruments. But these are minimum standards, and most curricula give you only three to six hours under the hood. If you stay "current" on instruments, you may be able to perform escape maneuvers (the standards emphasize 180-degree turns, climbs, and descents on instruments) successfully. If rusty, well, you're definitely taking your chances.
On-top operations do have their advantages, and they can be done safely. Others don't share the United States' optimism on this point. VFR- on-top flying is prohibited in Canada, Europe, and most other foreign locales.
We have the privilege of giving it a shot, whether VFR or IFR. But good, common sense dictates a sound knowledge of weather basics, a healthy skepticism about forecasts, and a tactical approach to dealing with changeable weather. You'll need plenty of contingency plans if the tops rise, the layers merge, or fog or clouds close up beneath. And these plans should be fleshed out before you take off.