Get extra lift from AOPA. Start your free membership trial today! Click here

Single-Pilot IFR

Is it safe to fly IFR as a single pilot?

Foreword

Is it safe to fly IFR as a single pilot? This question is constantly debated by pilots, and there are strongly held and divergent opinions on both sides of the issue. Most would agree that the alternative of flying IFR with an experienced and competent copilot, operating as a team, enhances safety of the flight; however, single-pilot IFR flights can and are executed safely and without incident hundreds of times daily.

As a pilot, what you really want to know is, how safe is it and can you do it safely? You must first ask yourself how safe you want it to be. How much effort and money are you willing to invest? Single-pilot IFR can be as safe as you choose to make it, and there are many things you can do to make it safer. The purpose of this safety advisor is to explore some of the things you might do to give yourself the safety advantage. Although the suggestions presented herein are not all inclusive, they should stimulate some serious thought and introduce some new concepts. Those things over which you have control must be controlled, and exposure to those that you don't must be minimized.

Introduction

The AOPA Air Safety Foundation's aviation safety database, which contains more than 32,000 general aviation accident reports, reveals that single-pilot IFR flights generate several times as many accidents as those flown with a pilot and copilot. We know intuitively, but without statistical proof, that most general aviation IFR operations are flown by a single pilot. Although exposure alone may explain a large part of the difference in the number of accidents, it's clear that single-pilot IFR is an area warranting special attention.

When reviewed in combination with FAA flying-hour activity reports, the database further reveals that the accident rate at night under IMC conditions is 68% higher than that for daytime flying and 30% more accidents occur in multiengine airplanes than in singles. Pilots with fewer than 50 hours in type are involved in IMC accidents almost twice as often as pilots with 50 to 100 hours in type. More IMC accidents occur during the landing phase than any other phase of flight. Many are the result of fuel mismanagement. Not many surprises here, are there? We would have suspected as much.

Yes, there is a problem with single-pilot IFR, but not one that can't be improved upon. Virtually no type of flying requires greater skill and pilot concentration, imposes greater work loads and mental stress, and extracts higher penalities for mistakes than single-pilot IFR. Near-perfect performance is the minimum standard. That standard can be attained and maintained, but it takes a dedicated commitment on the part of the pilot wishing to get the most utility from his flying and at the highest level of safety possible. What's the problem? A single pilot flying hard IFR is pilot, navigator, radio operator, systems manager, records keeper, oft-times flight attendant, and sometimes zoo keeper. It sure helps to have a copilot to share the duties and back up your action, but when you don't have a copilot-and most general aviation single-engine and light twin pilots don't-you must cope and cope well. The obvious problem is high work load, and in high-density-traffic areas under very poor weather conditions, the work load can become extremely high-even to the point of exceeding your capabilities. Capabilities vary from pilot to pilot and, with a given pilot, vary with time and circumstances. Let's investigate those factors that affect your capability, determine what you have the power to control, and then decide what you can do to assure that you are operating at peak performance at all times.

You know that you are going to face a heavy work load, so you must be prepared to deal with it so that problems don't compound to the point that you can't handle the situation. The work load (and stress) goes up dramatically when the unexpected happens. Any surprise or distraction puts you in the reactive mode and starts to wrest control from you. The ability to react and regain control is a measure of a good instrument pilot. A second or third distraction encountered while still wrestling with the first can rapidly escalate to an out-of-control situation. The distractions can be as simple as arriving at a fix without having planned your subsequent actions or as complex as having an engine fail at localizer interception. Most people can juggle one ball, but two or more?

Prepare ? Don't Gamble

The obvious solution is to plan ahead in excruciating detail everything that can be anticipated. Let's take the airplane and equipment first. Are you planning to have a vacuum pump fail on this flight? Of course not. But you can make certain that the airplane was inspected as required; that you preflighted the system as recommended; and that you know how the system works, what the indications of a failure are, and the procedures recommended in the emergency checklist. If you don't yet have an intimacy with this particular type of airplane or can't determine that everything is as it should be before takeoff, then don't risk an IFR flight. Don't gamble. Gambling is based on chance, and chance by definition means some percentage of the time the results will favor you and sometimes they will not.

Equipment ? How Much Is Enough?

Part of planning ahead is to make sure your aircraft is properly equipped to make IFR flight easier. If you own your airplane, this is under control within some financial limits. Those of you who rent are limited to looking for an FBO that puts a little extra into its IFR airplanes and your complementing it with certain portable equipment such as headsets, boom microphones, push-to-talk switches, stopwatches, intercoms, etc.

Today, we generally consider minimum IFR equipment to be dual nav/coms, glideslope and marker beacon receivers, and an ADF although it can be done safely with less. Let's look at a few additions that can be very helpful. A headset with boom microphone and a yoke-mounted push-to-talk switch are high on most pilots' lists. The ability to reply without reaching for the hand mike eliminates a major distraction that always comes just when you need both hands for something else. The headset that the boom mike is attached to also solves most of the confusion of missed or misunderstood transmissions, by providing clearer audio reception and shielding external noise.

An autopilot slaved to a heading bug is invaluable in keeping the airplane right side up and going in the general direction desired while reading charts, copying revised clearances, tuning radios, etc. Altitude-hold and coupling features are added benefits, but even a wing leveler is much better than nothing and can serve quite well.

The minimum aid in keeping you precisely aware of your position at all times is a DME. A radial and distance and a little thought are all you need to avoid ever being surprised when it's time to take the next action. Of course, an RNAV, GPS, or loran is great and can give you distance information, plus a lot more. A word of caution is appropriate here. Unless you learn to use these receivers efficiently and understand their limitations, the potential for errors exists. Some devices are so difficult to program that they wind up increasing the work load and becoming major distractions in themselves

The next favorite item is the ability to preselect frequencies on the com and nav receivers and call them up with the press of a button. This enables you to plan ahead and avoid distractions. A much preferred radio is one that displays both the active and preselected frequencies simultaneously. With this feature, you can be prepared for the next two or three frequency changes and also return instantaneously to the last one when no contact is made after a change-all this without the need to grab pencil and paper.

If your wish list were unlimited (which it isn't), it would probably include electric trim, an HSI, an RMI, a remote ID button, an altitude preselect and alerter on the autopilot, a radar altimeter, and a host of others. Most pilots are nuts about gadgets, and all of these things can contribute to easing the work load while providing more information and avoiding distractions. However, the few mentioned first will do quite nicely and probably provide the greatest dividends for the smallest investment.

Please don't think that simply loading the airplane with every conceivable device you can afford solves the problem. That is not advocated here, nor will it automatically decrease the work load and enhance safety. It is essential that each aid used be thoroughly understood and familiar to the pilot. Better to be competent in the essential equipment than confused and intimidated by sophisticated but poorly understood equipment.

Don't overlook a worthy and relatively inexpensive addition to every IFR pilot's flight kit: a good hand-held nav/com transceiver. The true value of this item will not be fully appreciated until you suffer complete electrical failure in IMC conditions. It is also quite useful for obtaining clearances before engine start, saving fuel when experiencing ATC ground delays, getting weather reports, and a number of other around-the-airport uses.

Organization

Probably the easiest way for an otherwise competent pilot to make single-pilot IFR simpler is through advance planning and organization. This means having a cockpit so neat and tidy that your mother would be proud of you. A place for everything and everything in its place. There isn't room in the cockpit for everything. Preselect every chart and publication you might possibly need, but only those you need. Put them in the order you expect to use them and have them open, folded, or tabbed as appropriate. Put them away when finished. Have pencil and paper handy. Stick-on note paper is excellent. Keep flashlights, calculators, plotters, etc., available but out of the way when not needed. The secret is how you manage the tools you have. There are kneeboards, lapboards, clipboards, chart bags, yoke clips, and many other aids to help you organize; find what serves you best. Some pilots like to have formatted forms prepared on which to copy weather and clearances. An approach chart holder centered on the yoke can be invaluable.

Another use for the stick-on note paper is to cover malfunctioning instruments. It's funny how poor our scan pattern can get, but let an artificial horizon die and roll over to a 20 bank, 10 nose-down attitude and try to take it out of your scan and ignore it. Impossible!

Real-Time Weather

What we have been talking about is normally referred to as "cockpit resource management," a buzz phrase that simply means: What tools are available when flying and how can you use them most efficiently? You should not overlook some resources necessary to safely negotiate your way through the murk while avoiding the really hazardous stuff. Real-time weather information comes from both cockpit-located gadgets and the services provided by ground-based systems. In any case, it is the job of the pilot in command to manage the acquisition of needed data and integrate it into the execution of the flight-another ball to juggle.

As you planned this flight in great detail, you gathered existing and forecast weather from several sources, from TV to DUAT or the final briefing by the flight service station specialist. How to best do this is a subject unto itself and is discussed at length in another AOPA Air Safety Foundation publication: Weather, Flight Planning and the Pilot. As we all know, however, once enroute the weather will change, and it will probably not be as forecast. An axiom about a forecast is that the weather will always be either better or worse than forecast but never as forecast. As a flight progresses, it is a great comfort to find things getting better than expected, and you want to enjoy that warm feeling as soon as possible. On the other hand, if it is getting worse than expected, it behooves you to know that as soon as possible to avoid those unwanted surprises and, if necessary, execute a contingency plan in a timely manner. Your best source of weather updates in flight is from the Enroute Flight Advisory Service (EFAS), known as "Flight Watch," available on 122.0 MHz. EFAS is designed for just what you want, a continuous exchange between pilots in flight and Flight Watch personnel. It provides the latest information on current weather reports and hazardous weather as observed by other pilots or on weather radar. Here's where you find out about thunderstorms, turbulence, icing, and low visibilities or high winds.

Often you can get weather-related assistance from the controlling agency you are working with. The ground controller is more than willing to help you out, but the facts are that he is unable to give you the help you would like much of the time due to the work load in fulfilling his primary responsibility of controlling and separating IFR traffic. Equipment limitations also hinder him. Weather radar may not be available. Air traffic radar is not designed to see weather, and what capability it does have may be suppressed in order to see aircraft. The time that help is most needed is usually in circumstances when it is least likely to be available. Don't plan on it. If you are lucky enough to have storm avoidance equipment like airborne radar or a Stormscope, you are indeed a leg up. ATC is most generous, whenever possible, in allowing route deviation to avoid hazardous weather, when you can provide your own warning source. Possessing a radar or Stormscope is not synonymous with using them to the best advantage, however. There is something of an art to interpreting them effectively, so take the time to get proper training on their operation.

Avoid Distractions Through Planning

Distractions have been mentioned several times as something to avoid. One of the most obvious sources of distraction is passengers. Brief them in advance that there will be times you must be occupied with controllers and times your attention will be completely devoted to flying the airplane. They will understand especially when they can no longer see the ends of the wings. If they still won't leave you alone to concentrate, try sweating profusely in an otherwise cold cockpit. That will get their attention! The biggest source of distractions, however, are self-induced and come from lack of planning and anticipation.

Advance planning is mostly accomplished on the ground. Think through and mentally execute the entire flight, at least to the extent that you look at each phase and say to yourself, "Before takeoff, I expect to do thus and so, and I will need such and such available. On departure, I expect so and so and should be ready to?" Look at the SIDs, STARs, and approaches you expect to get, as well as those you might be given, and the same for your alternate. This also helps to organize the cockpit.

Stay Ahead of the Airplane While in Flight ? Act Rather Than React

In flight, there is a systematic thought process that is especially helpful. An analogy is position reporting something we don't often do anymore. Remember? Report where you are, give the ETA at the next reporting point and the name of the subsequent one. This analogy concerns events and actions. An "event" is a happening such as station passage, arriving at an altitude, intercepting the glideslope, and so on. When an event happens, "action" is required. Say (to yourself) what the next expected event is, what action is required, and what will be the subsequent event. As an example, think of intercepting the localizer on an ILS approach. "At intercept [the event], I must turn to the inbound heading and start a descent to 2,000 feet. The next event will be arrival at 2,000 feet. [All I have to do in the meantime is track the localizer and descend.] When I get to 2,000 feet, I must level off [action required]and start looking for glideslope interception [the subsequent event."] After each event happens and the required action has been taken, you mentally redefine the next event and subsequent one. Some pilots do this aloud, and this seems to help. In any case, you are never surprised and always ahead of the aircraft. I have observed many pilots who could fly precision instruments but had no systematic way of anticipating their next move to the extent that they became ineffective as instrument pilots. I have seen pilots being vectored to localizer interception concentrate so hard on the heading and altitude that the localizer would center and peg on the far edge and still be oblivious to everything except the heading and altitude. Ever happen to you? Try this thought process consciously a few times, and see if your preparedness improves.

Know Where You Are ? Always

A favorite term these days is "positional awareness." This simply means knowing where you are in space at all times. If you follow your position even when being vectored, you know what to anticipate next and are never surprised. Here's where that DME comes in handy. If what you hear does surprise you, maybe it's time to question the controller. They have been known to make mistakes. To maintain positional awareness, sometimes it's helpful to sketch your position on the lapboard you use or just make a dot on the approach chart now and then. A centered OBS needle with a "from" indication, coupled with a closely approximated DME measurement (radial and distance,) immediately resolves all questions about where you are. Equally as important is "situational awareness." Is the fuel remaining adequate or have routing changes or extensive vectoring consumed more than planned? Is the current weather following the forecast for both destination and alternate or is the trend better or worse than forecast? Can you expect a straight-in approach, or will it be necessary to circle to land? You must stay aware of any changes affecting the safety of flight to make decisions enroute. The flight is not over until the airplane is safely at rest on the ground.

Unofficial Copilot?

A question that always comes up when single-pilot IFR is discussed is what about using a nonpilot as a pseudo copilot. Surely there are lots of things a second body could do to relieve the work load very true. However, there are some serious cautions to be observed when using a nonpilot. First of all, know whom you're using and what they know or don't know about flying and whether they might be prone to show too much initiative in helping you out. The potential for disaster is great when using the wrong person and, in the best case, can result in increased rather than decreased work load. Having said all that, yes, a spouse or companion who frequently flies with you and understands exactly what you want done, and in whom you have confidence that unwanted actions will not occur, can be a help. Train them, brief them thoroughly, and use them with discretion.

Currency and Training

Without question, the most essential and important piece of the single-pilot IFR equation revolves around currency and recurrent training, the key to proficiency. Do you recall the expression used earlier: "an otherwise competent pilot"? All of the helpful hints, suggestions, and equipment in the world are worthless if the pilot is not physically and mentally healthy, knowledgeable, well trained, skillful, and current. Don't fly unless you're physically and mentally fit. That's common sense, and we won't belabor that point.

Skill is in a separate category from the other attributes needed. Skill is a result of some level of native ability, intelligence, and motor reactions you possess that are channeled and directed by training and perfected by practice. Good training can allow you to make the most of what you start with, but practice is what results in the highest level of performance achievable. Remember when you first started flying, and it took 100% of your attention to fly straight and level? Only through practice does flying become automatic, and the level of proficiency required to be a good instrument pilot is that where basic control of the aircraft requires no conscious thought. Routine maneuvers must be instinctive and automatic or they become distractions that interfere with procedures that do require attention and conscious thought.

All flying, whether IFR or VFR, is a matter of continuously correcting deviations from the desired flight parameters. How quickly you recognize a deviation and how smoothly you correct it is a measure of your skill. The Old Pro for whom all instruments seem to freeze in the right position simply perceives deviations almost before they become apparent and corrects them instinctively with such small and smooth control pressures that you don't realize a correction has taken place. You must reach a level where you interpret and respond automatically to integrated instrument indications and not to one-at-a-time interpretations. For instance, if your airplane is below the desired altitude, do you correct with pitch, with power, or with both? Obviously, it depends upon other things such as what the airspeed is doing and what the attitude is. If you have to think about it rather than seeing the situation as a whole and reacting instinctively, then you are not ready to face the demands of serious instrument flying, especially alone. Such skills come only through practice and can be retained only through practice. The use of a simulator or procedures trainer, or PC training device can be an inexpensive way to retain and sharpen your basic flying skills. Even though it may not duplicate your cockpit or your airplane's flying characteristics, the basics of instrument interpretation and aircraft control are universal. One hour in a simple trainer prior to an instrument flight can significantly improve your scan and technique and will show in your performance.

Not only is practice essential, but every pilot should periodically fly with an instructor to check on bad habits that may be developing and to review procedures. Choose only instructors who are actively teaching instruments, for they will be most current themselves. Also, try to fly with different instructors. You'd be surprised how many new tidbits you pick up, and a fresh perspective is always helpful. When you practice, don't forget the emergencies. These are the ultimate distractions. Plan for emergencies and practice emergencies. If you use a simulator, practice to failure. In other words, compound the adversities to the point you do overload. You can learn a lot about your limitations and also expand your capabilities. When an emergency occurs, remember to take your time. Be deliberate, control the aircraft, handle the emergency, navigate, and then communicate.

Confidence or Complacency?

The better you get, the more confident you become. When confidence becomes complacency, you're in deep trouble. Without modesty, when you really are good, you know it. Constantly be on guard that your confidence doesn't exceed your ability. Unfortunately, our skills deteriorate at a different rate than does our confidence. Without periodically testing ourselves and reestablishing our skill level through currency practice, we can wind up in exactly that state-confidence well beyond competence.

In Summary

Consider the following recommendations:
  • Keep current-practice (include a simulator or procedures trainer if available).
  • Don't let your confidence exceed your ability.
  • Be aware of and control fatigue, and mental and physical condition.
  • Pay more attention to detail when checking equipment and weather.
  • Flight plan more thoroughly, walk through your entire proposed flight, and rehearse alternative approaches, alternates, missed approaches, and emergencies.
  • Prepare in advance: Organize your charts and the cockpit.
  • Stay continuously aware of your position in space, the weather, and fuel remaining.

Now ask the question again: Is single-pilot IFR safe? It is, and it can be made safer. Safe instrument flying is a matter of attitude and discipline. If you have the proper attitude and the self-discipline to follow the recommendations made here, you can enjoy a long and successful career of single-pilot IFR flying.

Related Articles