Magnetic course must still be converted to magnetic heading, groundspeed and time en route must be estimated, and fuel consumption must be calculated; but use of any effective memory jogger such as F2T2 or F2T5 will get the new pilot well on his or her way to an alternate landing site.
Lt. Col. John Wightman
Dayton, Ohio
I was surprised to see that the author of "Learning Experiences: Getting Hosed" (August AOPA Flight Training) had never flown an approach and landing with a simulated airspeed indicator failure. Early in my flight training, my instructor had me fly several patterns with both the airspeed indicator and altimeter covered up, reminding me that pitch and power are what make an airplane fly, not instruments.
Now a flight instructor myself, I also have all of my students fly several traffic patterns this way - first one with the airspeed indicator covered and then one with both the airspeed indicator and the altimeter covered. I find that this reinforces basic flight concepts and builds student confidence, in addition to preparing them for dealing with a possible anomaly in the future. Most of the time students fly the pattern at least as well as, if not better than, if they had all the instruments available to them.
I think that today's students are often overly reliant upon their instruments and lack basic understanding of what makes an airplane fly. I routinely cover up the gyro instruments during initial student training and will cover up all of the instruments if I think a student is fixating too much on them. I try to teach that pitch and power are what make an airplane fly - the instruments are there to verify that the airplane is actually doing what you think it should be.
Although I applaud Mr. Stone's resourcefulness in using his GPS to help with his problem, I can't help but think that if he had a better understanding of how his airplane flies in the first place, he may not have bothered to use the GPS except to perhaps help him navigate to his intended point of landing.
Eileen Bjorkman
Via e-mail
The old saying, "No two pilots are alike," is a phrase I have heard from my Uncle Pete, an old-time aviator.
He's absolutely right - you have to tailor your needs, wants, and safety to settle on a happy medium. Suggestions in the cockpit can't be looked upon as being negative; it's not about authority or who has the upper hand. Two-pilot operation is about one looking out for the other - "you watch my back and I'll watch yours." I am always up for pointers, and I'll take any tip into consideration. The valuable lesson is to never hold a grudge against your colleague.
Let's ask ourselves, are two pilots better than one? I'd say, "absolutely." Four eyes are better than two, four ears are better than two, and two brains are better than one. Two-pilot operation is a negotiable regime. Respect a "heads up," and don't neglect it.
Chad M. King
Syracuse, New York
AOPA Flight Training received an incorrect price for Stephen Casner's Cockpit Automation for General Aviators ("Pilot Products," August). The correct price is $32.99.