Air pollution study not needed at California airport, AOPA says
AOPA is pointing out the flaw in a California bill that would require the monitoring of taxi and idle operations for all aircraft at Santa Monica Municipal Airport in order to understand the air pollution impacts from idling jets on the surrounding community: It's already been done, and there are no negative health impacts.
Last week, AOPA testified against Assembly Bill 2501 during a hearing before the Assembly National Resources Committee. However, the bill passed and is now with the Assembly Appropriations Committee. So AOPA has gone on record once again to show the serious consequences this unnecessary bill could have on GA.
In October 2005, the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services' Toxics Epidemiology Program released a health assessment of the communities around Santa Monica Airport. There is no "evidence of elevated rates of mortality related to impaired lung function or heart disease...elevated rate of low-birth-weight births...[or] statistically elevated rates for any type of reported birth defect."
AOPA takes issue not only with the redundancy of the proposed study, but also with the staffing and cost burden it would place directly on airports and AOPA members.
The bill does not provide state funding for the cost that would be required to hire staff to monitor all aircraft operations at the airport.
"This bill would set a bad precedent for potential new restrictions on...hundreds of small GA airports," said Owen Sweeney, AOPA manager of state and local government affairs. "Very few GA airports have the personnel resources to meet the extensive and burdensome monitoring requirements of this bill, and many of these airports are not even attended around the clock."
May 4, 2006
Related Articles
