Being a lawyer, a simple and obvious question that is often asked of me is, "What is my liability as a flight instructor?" The answer, unfortunately, is not so simple.
The law of each individual state governs negligence, so there could be variations that affect the success or outcome of a lawsuit, depending on which state the case was brought. Nevertheless, there are a few general requirements pertaining to the ability to hold someone liable in a lawsuit that is based on someone's negligence.
First, there must be negligence, which is defined in the law as the failure to use such care as a reasonably prudent and careful person would use under similar circumstances.
Second, there must be a duty owed to the person who has been harmed, which must be evident from the relationship between the parties.
Third, for the court to hear a lawsuit based on negligence, there must be harm done to someone-in other words, someone must have suffered some damages that a court could then remedy by an award of money if the negligence is proved.
Negligence is a tort, which is a civil-as opposed to criminal-wrong but does not include a breach of contract. Negligence is distinct from other torts, such as intentional torts (punching somebody in the nose) or torts for which strict liability is imposed. There are sometimes legal defenses, such as the contributory or comparative negligence of the person making the claim, which provides that if the person who is harmed has some fault in the harm, then the claim may be prohibited or reduced by the extent of that person's participation in causing the harm.
In the flight instruction context, an instructor owes a duty of care to his student and others. As long as the flight instructor exercises due care in giving flight instruction, there would be no negligence, even if a harm occurs because of the flight instructor's actions. However, if the instructor fails to exercise due care, the instructor is negligent and is liable if the negligence causes damage. If the person who was hurt participated, facilitated, or caused the flight instructor's negligent actions, that could serve to protect the flight instructor against full liability for the resulting damages.
The good news is that there are very few lawsuits initiated against individual flight instructors. There are practical reasons for that. The biggest is that plaintiff lawyers are usually looking for a "deep pocket" since the lawyer only gets paid if there is a recovery. If possible, then, the lawyer will file the lawsuit against the flight school or the fixed-base operator, and the insurance company ordinarily defends the lawsuit and pays any judgment or settlement, without any contribution by the flight instructor. Since insurance is more readily available to flight instructors than it used to be, individual flight instructors might prove to be a more attractive target in a lawsuit than they have been in the past.
Are there ways to avoid a lawsuit? Well, we can't stop someone from filing the lawsuit, but we can take actions to avoid a reason to bring a lawsuit and to keep someone from being successful in the lawsuit. There are a few things I typically recommend to flight instructors to protect against bad things happening and a charge of negligence associated with their flight instruction activities. Incorporate quality control measures into your work; that is, stay informed, educated, and proficient, and you cut down the chances of something going wrong. Double-check what you do to catch mistakes before they cause trouble. Employ conservative personal minimums, and you reduce the risk of being exposed to something going wrong.
And, if you can afford it, get insurance and protect yourself and your loved ones against having to pay an attorney or a judgment from personal assets. As with many things, begin by using good and prudent judgment.
Kathy Yodice is an attorney with Yodice Associates in Washington, D.C., which provides legal counsel to AOPA and administers AOPA's legal services plan. She is an instrument-rated private pilot.