With some 1,800 airplanes delivered since its debut in 1985, Cessna’s Caravan ranks as an icon among utilitarian singles. It’s a massive Pratt & Whitney-powered 675-shp turboprop that stands tall on the ramp, has a maximum payload of some 3,000 pounds, a huge unpressurized cabin, and yet behaves surprisingly like a Cessna Skyhawk. FedEx validated the Caravan concept when it bought 200 airplanes, beginning with early-model CE-208 Caravans—the 208A “Cargomaster” variants with 600-shp engines, no windows, and a 37-foot, seven-inch-long fuselage. In 1988, the CE-208B replaced the original versions; it came with a four-foot fuselage stretch and more power from a 675-shp Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6A-114A engine. FedEx, needing more cabin volume, bought more windowless Caravans dubbed “Supercargomasters.” But from day one, private customers were equally taken with the Caravan, and by 1991 500 had been sold. The Caravan—the first of a new generation of turboprop singles—had arrived.
You might even say that the Caravan has achieved cult status. Some owners have given their airplanes wild paint schemes, adapted them for backcountry camping, or fitted them out with amphibious floats and skis. A few have even swapped out the stock Pratt & Whitneys for 850-shp Honeywell TPE-331-12JR engines under Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) authorizations from Aero Twin (in Anchorage) and Texas Turbines (in Celina, Texas). Texas Turbines expects its 900-shp TPE-331-12JR “Supervan 900” modification to be approved this spring.
Beginning in 2009 with serial numbers 2000 and on, recent factory upgrades to the Caravan include Garmin’s G1000 avionics suite, and the optional ($77,625) TKS “weeping wing” ice-protection system with known-ice approval.
I’d never flown a Caravan, so I spent some time at FlightSafety International’s Cessna Learning Center at Wichita’s Mid-Continent Airport. There, instructor Jeff Enochs showed me the ropes in FSI’s Level D Caravan simulator. This included a review of engine start procedures, the Caravan electrical system (there’s a main 200-amp starter-generator, plus a belt-driven 75-amp standby alternator), and some ballpark power settings. For example, while being vectored for an instrument approach, or in a VFR traffic pattern, I was told to remember the “10-11-12” mnemonic. This stands for 10 degrees of flaps, 1,100 foot/pounds of torque, and the resultant airspeed—120 KIAS. Once on an instrument approach, power is reduced to 600 foot/pounds. Pitch down on the final approach course to maintain 120 KIAS, and your subsequent descent rate should be spot on. Get any slower than 120 KIAS on approach and the increased deck angle may give you poor forward visibility. That huge snout blocks the view during steep climbs and too-slow approaches.
The simulator gave me a chance to make peace with the latest version of the G1000. This comes with the usual flight plan functions that anyone familiar with Garmin’s 530/430 would immediately recognize, plus a few more. One is a vertical navigation capability that lets you enter crossing altitudes on the descent legs of a flight plan. Another feature is a Victor airway database that lets you enter airways on a flight plan. With this, you enter your start and exit points from a fix’s drop-down airway menu. As for the autopilot and flight control system, its control panel is mounted above the G1000—not in the MFD bezel, as is the case with piston single and twin installations.
One thing the simulator drove home was the sensitivity of the power lever. Push too aggressively—during a takeoff, go-around, or stall recovery, for example—and you risk overtorquing the engine. And don’t think no one will know: There’s a trend-monitoring system that keeps track of exceedances in torque, temperature, and other engine and system-wide parameters.
After three instrument approaches and some airwork I began to get more comfortable in the (huge) cockpit. Two ILS approaches in low IFR weather (300-foot ceiling, one-half-mile visibility in blowing snow) proved the wisdom of the 10-11-12 rule, and also showed off the simulator’s excellent bag of very convincing, high-resolution visual tricks.
On a missed approach, another G1000 upgrade proved extremely helpful. The new version flies the entire missed approach procedure—complete with holding pattern. Simply hit the power lever’s go-around button. This automatically pitches up the command bars, disconnects the autopilot (if you were using it), unsuspends GPS nav sequencing, and switches the CDI (course deviation indicator) to GPS mode. Then all you do is hit NAV on the autopilot panel, and the system will fly the whole missed approach procedure (but you’re still in charge of preselecting the appropriate altitudes). By the way, Garmin prohibits raw-data ILS approaches below 400 feet agl; the flight director must be used in these situations.
Approaching the Caravan, your first thought might center on how to enter the cockpit. It’s a big step up, and for that purpose a two-piece, sliding ladder is unfolded from the door sill. Once inside the cockpit, you’ll see a large, handy door pocket where you can store checklists and manuals. The yoke is attached to a floor-mounted control column—a feature some believe essential to a “big airplane” identity.
Starting is PT6-simple. Fuel boost pump On, hit the starter, wait for 12-percent NG (gas generator speed), then move the red condition lever to the Low Idle position. Disengage the starter at 52-percent NG. Monitor oil pressure and fuel flow for normal indications, and then it’s pretty much time to taxi. Our cargo pod- and TKS-equipped airplane—serial number 2002—weighed 8,646 pounds (104 pounds short of max takeoff weight), with myself, Cessna demonstration pilot Jim Oliver, plus two passengers and full fuel. That meant a fair amount of breakaway power to get the ship taxiing.
I’d seen normal takeoffs in the simulator, so we did a short-field takeoff for our departure out of Wichita. For this, it’s 20 degrees of flaps, stand on the brakes, power up to just short of torque redline (torque will increase as speed builds during the takeoff run), release the brakes, rotate at 70 KIAS, and climb out at 83 KIAS. The Caravan levitated off the runway, so clearing the mythical 50-foot obstacle in short order posed no problem. Our rate of climb settled at 850 fpm, then dropped to 700 fpm as the nose was lowered for better visibility at the en route climb speed of 110 KIAS.
Airwork revealed the Caravan’s somewhat ponderous aileron forces, in spite of the spoileron-plus-aileron roll control. That big rudder also calls for some attention, what with all the torque from the 675 horses. I found myself retrimming quite a bit after each configuration change. Steep turns were easy, thanks to the G1000’s flight director command bars. Engage altitude hold mode on the autopilot controller, then just keep the nose of the symbolic airplane tucked into the apex of the command bars.
Stalls were docile enough, with plenty of warning. One full stall was preceded by gobs of stall horn noise and a lot of buffeting, and ended with a moderate, straight-ahead break.
At 6,000 feet I set up cruise power using 1,750 propeller rpm. To set maximum torque, you advance power until the torquemeter needle nestles in a blue bug. At an OAT of plus-5 Celsius and a 1,750 propeller rpm we were well below the ITT redline of 740 degrees, burning 389 pph/58 gph of Jet-A, and truing out at 165 KTAS. Indicated airspeed was 153 KIAS. So the Caravan is no speed demon; speed was traded away by all those struts and a large frontal profile. You hear about Caravans cruising at 180 KTAS, but that’s for airplanes without the belly-mounted cargo pod installed, and under optimal conditions. That pod costs about 10 knots in cruise speed, which, along with the reduced rpm, accounted for our slower cruise.
What happens if the engine quits? Oliver simulated this by having me reduce the power to flight idle while he pulled the prop lever to the Feather position. As soon as the prop feathered, the airplane surged forward as drag reduction kicked in. Now the job is to maintain the best glide speed of 95 KIAS, and start looking for a place to land. Surpisingly, Cessna says, the Caravan’s glide ratio (1:14) is better than the Skyhawk’s (1:9).
The real fun happens during landings. You can use power to quickly capture any climb or descent rate or angle you like. Retard the power below 500 foot/pounds and the prop blades flatten out, making for a giant, drag-producing disc. Do it abruptly and you’ll surge forward, pressing against your straps as the Caravan decelerates. By adjusting power this way, you watch the terrain rise and fall as you nail the touchdown zone in your sights. Normal landings are performed with full flaps (30 degrees of deflection), flying at 75 to 85 KIAS; for short field landings, fly at 78 KIAS until over the threshold. Be careful not to go to flight idle until you’re about to touch down. If you don’t, a hard landing awaits.
From 1987 to 2005 there were 41 Caravan accidents linked to icing. In many cases, this was more of a pilot problem than an icing problem. For example, 10 accidents were blamed on pilots taking off with ice or frost on the wings. Still, the airplane drew the FAA’s and NTSB’s interest on what was perceived as a Caravan icing issue. As a result, several icing-related safety recommendations and airworthiness directives (ADs) came out over the years.
One, AD 2006-06-11, requires an assist handle so pilots can inspect the upper surface of the wings for frost, snow, and ice during the preflight. Another, AD 2007-10-15, requires an illuminated warning light that automatically comes on when the airspeed drops below the airplane’s minimum icing speed. In older airplanes with pneumatic deice boots, this speed is 105 KIAS. In the new, TKS-equipped option, that speed is 110 KIAS with flaps up, and 95 KIAS with full flaps. Recommended approach speed with ice accumulations is 120 KIAS, with flaps extended no more than 20 degrees.
The cargo pod ($60,375), another popular option, can carry up to 1,090 pounds in its 111.5 cubic feet. It’s divided into four compartments, and the 11.7-gallon TKS fluid tank is installed between the second and third compartments. For those wanting TKS and no cargo pod, Cessna is developing a TKS fluid tank that will be incorporated into a new main landing gear fairing.
The plush, seven-place executive interior ($176,015 to $209,600, depending on materials), is installed in Wichita at Yingling Aviation. It features leather seating, slide-out tables, cup holders, and even an aft lavatory. Want an executive shuttle for short hops? This is your airplane. Cessna uses an Oasis-version Caravan to shuttle employees between the Wichita headquarters and its factory in Independence, Kansas.
Amphibious floats are yet another big option, especially for owner/operators in Alaska and other backcountry areas. Wipline is perhaps the biggest STC holder for Caravan float conversions, which run approximately $208,000 (straight floats) to $294,200 (amphibious floats)—plus installation.
Simple, easy to fly, well supported, and capable to the max, the Caravan’s future seems assured. And although it may have an angular, retro look compared to other turboprop singles—the Pilatus PC–12 and the Socata TBM 700 and 850 come to mind—it doesn’t hurt that a new Caravan is some $1 million less than this speedier, flashier competition.
E-mail the author at [email protected].
Cessna CE-208B Grand Caravan Average equipped price: $2.33 million, with cargo pod, | |
---|---|
Specifications | |
Powerplant | Powerplant Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6A-114A, 675-shp |
Recommended TBO | 3,600 hours |
Length | 41 ft 6 in |
Height | 15 ft |
Wingspan | 52 ft 1 in |
Wing area | 279.4 sq ft |
Wing loading | 31.3 lb/sq ft |
Power loading | 13.0 lb/shp |
Seats | 6 -8 |
Cabin length | 12 ft 9 in |
Cabin width | 5 ft 4 in |
Cabin height | 4ft 6 in |
Empty weight | 5,622 lb |
Max ramp weight | 8,785 lb |
Zero fuel weight | 5,215 lb |
Useful load | 4,105 lb |
Payload w/full fuel | 880 lb |
Max takeoff weight | 8,750 lb |
Max landing weight | 8,500 lb |
Fuel capacity, std | 335.6 gal/2,248 lb |
Baggage capacity | 1,090 lb, 111.5 cu ft |
Performance | |
Takeoff distance over 50-ft obstacle | 2,420 ft |
Max demonstrated crosswind component | 20 kt |
Rate of climb, sea level | 910 fpm |
Cruise speed/range w/NBAA fuel rsv, (fuel consumption), 10,000 ft @ Max cruise power | 168 kt/860 nm (364 pph/54 gph) |
Max operating altitude | 25,000 ft |
Service ceiling | 22,800 ft |
Landing distance over 50-ft obstacle | 1,740 ft |
Landing distance, ground roll | 915 ft |
Limiting and Recommended Airspeeds | |
V X (best angle of climb, SL to 20,000 ft) | 72 KIAS |
V Y (best rate of climb, SL to 10,000 ft) | 104 KIAS |
V A (design maneuvering, 8,750 lbs) | 148 KIAS |
V FE (max flap extended) | |
10 degrees | 175 KIAS |
20 degrees | 150 KIAS |
30 degrees | 125 KIAS |
V MO (max operating speed) | 175 KIAS |
V S1 (stall, clean) | 63 KIAS |
V SO (stall, in landing configuration) | 50 KIAS |
For more information, contact Cessna Aircraft Company, Post Office Box 7704, Wichita, Kansas 67277-7704; telephone 800-4-CESSNA; www.cessna.com/caravan.html All specifications are based on manufacturer’s calculations. All performance figures are based on standard day, standard atmosphere, sea level, gross weight conditions unless otherwise noted. |
By Mark R. Twombly
Compared to the carbureted piston engines that power the trainers many of us learned to fly in, turbine engines are complex, highly precise machines. They have to be; the crankshaft of a four-cylinder Lycoming O-320-D3G piston engine turns at a maximum of 2,700 rpm, while the fan section on a Pratt & Whitney JT15D spins at 15,904 rpm. High rpm is essential to making power in a lightweight turbofan or turboprop engine.
High-strung turbine engines rely on a variety of sensors to manage fuel flow, oil temperature, ignition, fire suppression, and pneumatics for pressurization, environmental, and anti- and deice functions. One of the basic measurements taken by engine sensors is temperature, and the sensor standing on the front lines of temperature is the T2 probe. (“T” stands for temperature, and “2” indicates the station or physical location of the probe with respect to other such probes.)
The T2 probe pictured here on a P&W JT15D engine is mounted in the engine inlet directly in the path of the air entering the engine. The probe is comprised of a bimetallic (alumel and chromel) thermocouple that generates a mild electric current, which varies according to ambient temperature. Another temperature probe, T2.6, is mounted toward the rear of the engine nacelle to measure the temperature of the air that bypasses the engine and is exhausted around the hot combustion gases.
The difference between T2 and T2.6 measurements represents the temperature rise in non-combusted airflow as it passes through the bypass duct. This difference is known as the T1 signal, and by adding it to the temperature of the combustion gas flow within the inner exhaust nozzle (the T6 signal), a T5 value is determined and displayed in the cockpit on the ITT (Inter-Turbine Temperature) gauge. This is the howgozit engine temperature gauge that the pilot monitors, especially during engine start and on takeoff and initial climb.
Some installations of the Honeywell TPE331 turboprop engine also have an ambient temperature probe positioned in the engine inlet. But instead of a thermocouple that produces a mild electric current, the temperature probe responds to changes in ambient temperature by expanding or contracting alcohol contained in a sealed duct that connects to a cam in the engine’s fuel control unit. Movement of the cam helps maintain the ideal fuel/air ratio for combustion.
Because it is in the engine inlet ahead of the fan, the T2 probe on the P&W JT15D is subject to icing, so it along with the engine nose cone and core inlet stators are continuously heated by engine bleed air. Its location also makes it vulnerable to FOD (foreign object damage) including bird strikes, so part of the preflight inspection is to check the T2 probe for visible damage.
E-mail the author at [email protected].