Get extra lift from AOPA. Start your free membership trial today! Click here

Rite of passage

The annual jet-pilot sim session

What’s the best option for initial or recurrent pilot training—using the actual airplane, or relying on a simulator-based experience? There are good arguments for both methods. Flying the airplane gives you true, real-world training. But simulation lets you push the envelope harder, providing abnormal and emergency situations that would be far too dangerous to duplicate while flying the actual airplane. Another advantage of simulation is the ease with which you can easily repeat maneuvers and procedures. Need to knock the rust off your V1-cut performance? With a simulator, you can do takeoff after takeoff in a minimal amount of time, because there’s no need to “fly” around the pattern after each cut.

Recurrent Pilot Training

  • Recurrent Pilot Training
    Cross the bridge to the simulator and you enter a world of practice—and humility.
  • Recurrent Pilot Training
    Instructor Ken Bettam mans the simulator’s control panel. Here, he’s changing the weather, probably to minimums.
  • Recurrent Pilot Training
    One-on-one class sessions are a daily staple...
  • Recurrent Pilot Training
    ...as is a review of normal and abnormal/emergency procedures.
  • Recurrent Pilot Training
    The Level D simulator cab, perched atop its six actuator arms. The simulator has six degrees of motion and behaves just like the real airplane.
  • Recurrent Pilot Training
    The cockpit’s G1000 avionics can be made to reproduce the terrain and procedures at any number of locations and airports around the world.
  • Recurrent Pilot Training
    Much of the flying in the simulator is done at "night". This gives you a chance to really focus on the G1000's many functions.

I’ve done turbine pilot initial training, recurrent training, flight reviews, and instrument proficiency checks using both the real McCoy and simulators. When I earned my type rating in the Cessna Citation Mustang, it was with Azma FLT Inc., based at Orlando’s Executive Airport. Ditto my first annual pilot-in-command proficiency check, to comply with FAR 61.58’s provisions. Both of those courses were great learning experiences. But this year I thought I’d go back to FlightSafety International (FSI) for that company’s three-day FAR 61.58 course.

Some consider FSI to be the gold standard in pilot and maintenance-technician training. The company has learning centers at 40 different sites around the world; offers training in more than 20 different manufacturers’ aircraft (including courses for 28 different Cessna Citation types alone); has an ab initio FlightSafety Academy at the Vero Beach, Florida, airport; and operates a division that designs and manufactures the company’s simulators. For the Mustang, courses are offered at FSI’s learning centers in Orlando, Wichita, and Farnborough, in the United Kingdom. I picked Orlando.

It’s amazing how much we can forget after a year’s worth of flying. That’s because things rarely go wrong, and we seldom practice responding to dire situations. It’s also amazing how much can be remembered once the first of the course’s three, four-hour ground school sessions begin.

The first day began with instructor Andrew Forgacs, who hit on a number of items worthy of mention. One had to do with the Mustang’s battery disconnect switch, located behind the pilot’s left elbow. It uses a solenoid that can drain the battery. Don’t use it to secure the airplane after landing, Forgacs said. Instead, disconnect the battery (it’s in the tailcone baggage compartment) manually. The battery disconnect switch is used as a last resort to disengage a stuck engine start relay, should the starter-disengage switch fail to work. It also can help to prevent a battery from overtemping.

It’s amazing how much we can forget after a year’s worth of flying. That’s because things rarely go wrong, and we seldom practice responding to dire situations.Here are some other items: In order for the autopilot to fully function, both attitude and heading reference systems (AHRSs) must be operating, so that pitch references can be compared. Lose one AHRS, and the airplane can’t fly in reduced vertical separation minimum (RVSM) airspace. Forgacs also brought up the use of the rotary annunciator test switch in flight. In short, try to avoid it. Test the cabin altitude alert, and pressurization could be disabled. Test the antiskid and it will shut off as part of a self-test cycle. In flight, you can safely check only the engine fire warning lights or the annunciator test lights.

You say you lost the Garmin G1000’s multifunction display (MFD) screen? You’ll still have the autopilot, but the Nexrad or traffic display—if it was on in the first place—will default to the insert map, and the flight plan display will go the primary flight display’s timer/ref screen.

In the rare event of a dual generator failure, the emergency standby instruments will be powered for only 30 minutes. That’s with the battery switch in the Emergency (EMER) position. Leave the battery switch in the normal (BATT) position and you’ll have a completely dark panel after a mere 10 minutes.

Speaking of dark, the first two-hour simulator session featured night operations around Memphis International Airport. There were ILS approaches, an RNAV GPS approach, and a no-flap landing. Because the Mustang simulator has the highest, Level D approvals, all takeoffs, landings, and other maneuvers can be logged, and each “flight” counted as a real one. That’s how faithful the FSI simulator is to the actual airplane’s behavior—right into ground effect. The visual display is equally impressive, with day, night, and dusk capabilities.

Day two featured instructor Ken Bettam, who showed off the visual system once again. This time, the simulator had us at Wichita’s Dwight D. Eisenhower National Airport, and the weather was low (500 OVC, visibility half a mile) and cold (2 degrees Celsius). There were several V1 cuts, a simulated engine fire, a duct overheat, a fuel imbalance, and a trip to the Salina, Kansas, Regional Airport—where it was 300 OVC and one mile visibility—followed by engine-out landings from ILS Runway 35 approaches.

After taking off to return to Denver, the skies miraculously cleared—but Bettam, doing his best ATC impression, announced that flocks of birds were spotted in the area.Day three was the “high-altitude” day, with a takeoff from Denver International Airport via the Denver 8 departure procedure to Colorado Springs Municipal Airport. A bad vector sent us toward high terrain, complete with TAWS warnings, and two ILS approaches to Colorado Springs’ Runway 17L followed.

The first approach involved an exciting wind shear encounter on short final, and a missed approach and hold. The second was less eventful, but on the subsequent takeoff—right after gear retraction—I got a crew alerting system (CAS) message: HYD PRESS LO.

Resetting the hydraulic pump circuit breaker did nothing to correct the problem, so now the drill was to pull it and leave it pulled; use the nitrogen blow-down bottle to extend the landing gear; then use the manual emergency brake handle to stop the airplane after landing. It takes a smooth, steady pull to both preserve the emergency brake’s nitrogen pressure and prevent the tires from skidding, as there is no antiskid. And no differential braking, either.

After taking off to return to Denver, the skies miraculously cleared—but Bettam, doing his best ATC impression, announced that flocks of birds were spotted in the area.

Shortly thereafter, one engine quit, then the other. It was a case of bird-induced double-engine flameout. And there was no time for a restart, as Colorado Springs was nearby.

It turns out the Mustang is a pretty good glider. The checklist says to maintain VREF—the green circle on the G1000’s airspeed tape—for best performance. Sure enough, I made the runway, and even had to circle to lose some extra altitude.

By now I’d logged six hours in the simulator and 12 hours of ground school. I’d flown all the maneuvers required for the initial type rating checkride—and then some—and Bettam endorsed my logbook sticker. I’m good for another year, and I have the virtual equivalent of a fresh instrument proficiency check, a flight review, AOPA’s annual flight review, and some more precious jet time.

Email [email protected]

Thomas A. Horne
Thomas A. Horne
AOPA Pilot Editor at Large
AOPA Pilot Editor at Large Tom Horne has worked at AOPA since the early 1980s. He began flying in 1975 and has an airline transport pilot and flight instructor certificates. He’s flown everything from ultralights to Gulfstreams and ferried numerous piston airplanes across the Atlantic.

Related Articles