Get extra lift from AOPA. Start your free membership trial today! Click here
Sponsored by Aircraft Spruce

Opinion: (What we have here is a) failure to rotate

Is the conventional wisdom wrong about why exhaust valves burn?

Piston aircraft engines have a lot of moving parts. Way too many, if you ask me. The thought of thousands of separate metal parts reciprocating, rotating, wiggling, wobbling, and rubbing against one another thousands of times a minute ought to make you nervous—it sure does me. It’s something I try hard not to think about while airborne, mainly because I fly a lot better when not distracted.

Click on image for captions

Illustrations and images supplied by the author Continental’s solid-stem exhaust valves dissipate heat quite differently than Lycoming’s sodium-filled valves. Example of poor concentricity of guide and seat. Valve terminology and face/seat angles. Lineup of five Continental exhaust valves. The left ones look healthy, the right ones don’t. Badly burned exhaust valve, and the same valve 1.7 hours after the valve was lapped in place and the failed rotocoil replaced. Failed Lycoming rotator cap (left) resulted in a hot spot on this exhaust valve (center). Lapping the valve in place and installing a new rotator cap resulted in a healthy looking valve 10.7 hours later. Continental rotocoil disassembled, showing the garter spring(top). Two garter springs, one in good shape, the other badly worn (bottom).

Of those thousands of moving parts, two kinds are the most worrisome: the ones most likely to blindside you with a costly, premature, unbudgeted-for engine overhaul or replacement, and the ones most likely to make you fall out of the sky (or at least soil your undies). The biggest offender in the safety-of-wallet category is the camshaft—and for Lycomings, the cam followers (aka tappets)—which presents by far the leading cause of premature engine teardowns. (Especially if you don’t count prop strikes, which you really shouldn’t since the propeller isn’t part of the engine.)

In the safety-of-flight category, hands-down the most-wanted villains are exhaust valves. Exhaust valves can ruin you day in at least two different ways: They can stick or they can burn. Although these problems can occur in any piston aircraft engine, sticking is much more common in Lycomings and burning is more common in Continentals. I discussed sticky valves at length in the July 2020 issue of AOPA Pilot (“Savvy Maintenance: Why Valves Stick,”)—hint: the answer is “leaded avgas”—so this column will focus on what we’ve learned about burned valves.

Don’t blame the pilot
After I purchased my first airplane in 1968—a new Cessna 182 Skylane powered by a Continental O-470-R—it didn’t take long for me to recognize that exhaust valves were the most vulnerable components of my engine. Burned exhaust valves were the principal reason cylinders flunked the annual compression test—in those days, anything less than 60/80 was considered unairworthy and condemned the cylinder to removal and replacement or rework. Mechanics invariably blamed burned exhaust valves on pilot mismanagement of the powerplant, and warned us not to lean our engines aggressively so we wouldn’t overheat the valves and cause them to burn. The standard A&P mantra was “fuel is cheaper than engines.”

Single-probe exhaust gas temperature (EGT) gauges were just coming into vogue then, and we were taught that the best way to prevent exhaust valve problems was to avoid operating at excessive EGTs. The implication was that EGT was a good proxy for exhaust valve temperature, and that keeping EGTs cool would assure that exhaust valves wouldn’t overheat.

This all sounded logical and convincing at the time, and most of us believed it. But it turned out to be complete hogwash.

If high EGTs were the cause of exhaust valve burning, then low-compression engines like the O-470-R in my Skylane would suffer more burned exhaust valves than high-compression engines like the IO-520-K in the Bellanca Viking I owned after I sold the Skylane. After all, a high-compression engine inherently has much lower EGTs than a low-compression engine does, because the high-compression engine is more efficient at converting the heat energy liberated during combustion into mechanical energy (horsepower) and so wastes less heat energy out the exhaust. That wasted heat energy is what we see in the cockpit as EGT, and it’s inversely correlated with compression ratio.

Of course, it’s simply not true that high-compression engines suffer fewer burned exhaust valves than low-compression engines. There is no statistically significant correlation between EGT and exhaust valve burning. It’s a myth.

Nor is aggressive leaning the culprit. In the 3,300 hours that I put on the 12 cylinders of the Continental TSIO-520-BBs in my Cessna Turbo 310 before finally retied them, I never suffered a single burned exhaust valve—not one—and those engines were always leaned aggressively, almost exclusively lean-of-peak except for takeoff and initial climb.

No, when an exhaust valve burns, it’s almost never the fault of the pilot. This turns out to be just another myth. But if it’s not the pilot’s fault, whose fault is it?

The short answer is that it’s generally the fault of the hardware. And that’s where the story really starts to get interesting.

Survival strategies
Exhaust valves must survive in an atmosphere of incredibly hot and corrosive gas whose temperature can reach 4,000 degrees Fahrenheit at the peak pressure point of the combustion event. To make matters worse, the valve stem must oscillate smoothly through a valve guide without benefit of lubrication (since the stem runs so hot that engine oil would just carbonize). It’s a miracle that these valves last as long as they do.

Key to the exhaust valve survival is the valve’s ability to shed this intolerable heat by transferring it to the cylinder head, which acts like a giant heat sink for the valve. There are two ways the valve can transfer its heat to the cylinder head: via contact between the valve’s head and the valve seat (when the valve is closed) and via contact between the valve’s stem and the valve guide (constantly).

Continental and Lycoming employ subtly different construction and heat-sinking strategies for their exhaust valves. Continental valves have solid stems and heads made of an exotic nickel-chromium superalloy called Nimonic known for its high-temperature, low-creep characteristics.

Lycoming valves are made of not-so-exotic stainless steel but have hollow stems partially filled with metallic sodium that has the consistency of toothpaste at room temperature, an unusually low melting point (208 degrees F) and high boiling point (1,621 degrees F), plus exceptional thermal conductivity. The sodium liquifies as the valve starts to heat up, sloshes back and forth inside the hollow valve stem, and greatly improves transfer of heat from the head of the valve to the stem.

As the graphic indicates, Continental’s solid-stem exhaust valves shed their heat predominantly through contact between the valve head and the valve seat, while heat dissipation of Lycoming sodium-filled valves is split evenly between the head-to-seat interface and the stem-to-guide interface. That’s why a close-tolerance fit between the stem and guide is essential to the survival of Lycoming valves, while Continental valves can usually cope with sloppy-fitting guides so long as the head of the valve makes firm, leak-free contact with the seat throughout its entire 360-degree circumference when the valve is closed (which it is about two-thirds of the time).

Threats to survival
Exhaust valves burn when the heat transfer path from the valve to the cylinder head is compromised. If the valve loses its heat sink, it can overheat and start to warp and possibly start to crack around the edges. This causes it to lose its seal with the valve seat, allowing extremely hot combustion gas to leak past the valve during the hottest part of the combustion event when the valve is supposedly closed. The escape of this extremely hot gas results in metal erosion and warping, which increases the leakage of hot gas past the valve. Lather, rinse, repeat, and soon the valve is toast.

Sometimes this is baked into the cake when the cylinder leaves the factory or the engine shop. For example, if the valve guide and valve seat are not perfectly concentric, the valve won’t seal perfectly around its entire 360-degree circumference. There was a period of years during the 1990s when the Continental factory stopped “post-reaming” valve guides after they were installed in the cylinder, and instead was pre-reaming them prior to installation. That turned out to be a really bad idea and resulted in serious concentricity issues. We started seeing large numbers of Continental exhaust valves burned after just 400 to 500 hours in service. Eventually, Continental went back to its tried-and-true post-reaming process and the concentricity problems largely went away. (For a while at least…read on.)

Grinding the valve so it makes proper contact with the seat is harder than it sounds. The overhaul manual calls for the face of the valve to be ground at a slightly different angle than the seat angle in order to provide a narrower contact footprint that will seal better. It turns out that this is tricky business. If the contact area is too wide the valve won’t seal well, but if it’s too narrow, the heat transfer path from the valve face to the seat is compromised. Valve and seat grinding is as much of an art as a science, and some engine shops do it better than others. Doing it right is particularly important for Continental valves because they are so dependent on face-to-seat heat transfer.

Lycoming sodium-filled valves are more dependent on the stem-to-guide heat transfer path, so worn guides that have a sloppy fit to the valve stems can lead to burned valves. This is one reason that Lycoming recommends regular “wobble testing” (Service Bulletin No. 388C) to check for play in the stem-to-guide interface. This is much less important for Continental engines, which tolerate worn guides far better.

Failure to rotate
Rotation is also essential to exhaust valve survival. Most Continentals and Lycomings employ exhaust valve rotators—Lycoming calls them “rotator caps” and Continental calls them “rotocoils”—that cause the valve to rotate a fraction of a degree each time the valve opens. At typical cruise rpm, the valve typically rotates a full 360 degrees each minute.

Exhaust valve rotation accomplishes two things: It ensures that the heat load is spread evenly and symmetrically across the face of the valve and prevents the development of hot spots that can cause the valve to warp and then to burn. Rotation also helps prevent the formation of deposits on the valve seat that can interfere with the valve’s ability to seal properly.

In recent years, we’ve been finding an increasing number of burned valves caused by failure of the rotator, particularly in Continental engines. My colleague Dave Pasquale A&P/IA who operates Pasquale Aviation in Pottstown, Pennsylvania has done extensive research on this, and many of the photos in this column were provided by Dave. The Continental rotocoil contains a garter spring that gets laterally “squished” every time the valve opens, and it’s the squishing of the spring that produces the rotation. Unfortunately, this squishing action also causes the spring to wear and eventually it wears enough that the rotocoil stops rotating the valve. Once that happens, it doesn’t take long for the non-rotating valve to develop a hot spot and eventually burn beyond salvation.

We’ve had the feeling that these rotocoil failures are happening a lot more frequently than they used to. There may be a good reason for this. It turns out that Continental’s vendor (Federal-Mogul, formerly TRW) made some subtle changes to the rotocoil that seem to have adversely affected its longevity. The older rotocoil (part number 629117) used a larger-diameter garter spring and was held together by a circlip, while the current rotocoil (part number 652112) uses a smaller-diameter garter spring, has no clip, and seems to be failing more quickly, sometimes after as few as 500 hours.

The good news is that it’s pretty easy to detect exhaust valves that have stopped rotating simply by inspecting them with a borescope. A valve that is rotating properly will have a symmetrical appearance the way valves A and B in the lineup at top right do. Valve A is cleaner because it has been operated mostly lean of peak (LOP), while valve B has more deposit buildup because it has been operated mostly rich of peak (ROP), but both are symmetrical and healthy-looking. Valve C exhibits subtle signs of asymmetry, probably because its rotocoil has started to fail. Valve D is profoundly asymmetric and definitely not rotating, though it hasn’t burned yet and might just need a new rotocoil. Valve E is also not rotating and has started to burn, though there’s a good chance the valve could be saved by lapping in place and installing a new rotocoil.

It’s amazing how quickly a failing valve can heal if it’s caught early enough. Look at the striking before-and-after photo I received from Dr. Gary Silver, an A&P/IA who owns, flies, and maintains a Cessna 421 powered by a pair of Continental GTSIO-520s. The photo (above) shows a borescope image of a badly burned number 4 exhaust valve in Silver’s left engine, and another image of the same valve only 1.7 hours after Silver lapped it in place and replaced the failed rotocoil. Remarkably, the nasty hot spot has almost completely disappeared.

What about Lycomings?
Lycoming exhaust valves use a completely different style of rotator and we don’t see them fail nearly as often, but it does happen occasionally. The Lycoming rotator is a small cap that sits on top of the valve stem, and the photo shows one that exhibits a deep linear groove worn by the tip of the rocker arm—a sure sign it’s not rotating. This one made it to 1,362 hours before the failure was discovered. Lapping the valve and replacing the rotator cap resulted in a much healthier-looking valve when it was borescoped again 10.7 hours later.

Here are the key takeaways: Burned valves aren’t your fault, they’re almost always a hardware problem. If you inspect your cylinders frequently (at least every 100 hours, 50 would be even better), you can catch valve issues early and avoid the need for cylinder removal. The borescope will show whether the valve is a viable candidate for lapping in place. Always replace the rotator when you do this. A follow-up borescope inspection 10 to 25 hours later will hopefully confirm you dodged the bullet. Pulling the jug should always be treated as the last resort.

[email protected]

Mike Busch
Mike Busch is arguably the best-known A&P/IA in general aviation. He writes the monthly “Savvy Maintenance” column in AOPA PILOT and hosts free monthly EAA-sponsored maintenance webinars. Mike is a mathematician by training, having received his Bachelor of Arts degree in mathematics from Dartmouth College. After Dartmouth, he did graduate work in mathematics at Princeton University and in business administration at Columbia University. While at Dartmouth, Mike did pioneering work in computer software development, and ultimately retired from a long, successful career as a software entrepreneur. Mike then co-founded AVweb in 1995 and served as its editor-in-chief and investigative journalist until its sale to Belvoir Publications in 2002. Through his work as a type club tech rep for Cessna Pilots Association, American Bonanza Society, and Cirrus Owners and Pilots Association, and as CEO of Savvy Aviation, Inc., Mike has helped thousands of aircraft owners resolve thorny maintenance problems that have stumped their local A&Ps. Founded in 2008, Mike’s company Savvy Aviation, Inc. provides a broad palette of maintenance-related services to thousands of owners of piston GA airplanes. Those services include maintenance management and consulting, engine monitor data analysis, a nationwide prebuy management program, and 24/7 breakdown assistance that’s essentially “AAA for GA.”
aircraft spruce logo

Aircraft Spruce

Sponsor of Aircraft Maintenance
Aircraft Spruce provides virtually everything a pilot or aircraft owner might need. As a Strategic Partner since 2012, the company sponsors programs that bring hands-on knowledge and DIY spirit to AOPA members.