Joe's open hangar

Will you get what you are paying for?

Let’s say you are looking for a hangar to store your aircraft. Joe, at the local federally obligated airport, built his hangar 20 years ago and is looking to sell. Joe had entered a 25-year lease with the airport when he agreed to build a hangar. He is proposing that you pay him six figures for his hangar and that you assume his remaining ground lease with the airport. Is this a good deal?

Photo by Chris Rose
Zoomed image
Photo by Chris Rose

Maybe, but be careful. One thing you need to be aware of is the airport’s grant assurances and how those may work in your situation. “Grant Assurance 38” states that when an airport owner and an aircraft owner agree that a hangar is to be built at the aircraft owner’s expense, the airport is to give the aircraft owner a long-term lease. The intent is to allow the aircraft owner an opportunity to recoup his investment in building the hangar.

But you did not build the hangar. And because you did not build the hangar, “Grant Assurance 38” does not require the airport to give you a long-term lease when Joe’s lease expires. Sure, if the airport allows you to assume the lease, you’ll likely enjoy the hangar for the next five years. Maybe the airport will grant you a new lease, although the term of the lease may be month-to-month, yearly, or something else. Whatever it is, it is unlikely to be the type of long-term lease the airport gave Joe. You may end up paying Joe six figures for something you use for only a few years, a situation you would surely be unhappy with.

There are a few things you can do to protect yourself here. One, make sure you carefully review Joe’s ground lease. For another, talk to the airport about lease terms. If they are unwilling to give you a lease term longer than a year, perhaps walking away is the best idea. Joe’s ground lease will eventually expire, and he may be leaving his hangar for the airport to lease. If that happens, you might get your hands on the hangar without writing a check to Joe (but expect to pay more for the lease). In any case, a conversation between you, Joe, and the airport about what the future will hold, and what commitments can be made, is a necessity.

aopa.org/pps 

Dan Hassing
Daniel Hassing is an in-house attorney with AOPA’s Legal Services Plan who counsels Plan members on a daily basis. He is a private pilot and a Part 107 UAS pilot. Before joining AOPA’s Legal Service Plan, Dan worked at a firm for 10 years, litigating cases across the United States. Dan also clerked for a Justice of the Nebraska Supreme Court for two years. Dan received his law degree at the University of Nebraska College of Law and received his bachelor’s degrees at the University of Nebraska-Omaha. In his free time, Dan enjoys spending time with his family, flying, and golf.

Related Articles

Get the full story

With the power of thousands of pilots, members get access to exclusive content, practical benefits, and fierce advocacy that helps enhance and protect the freedom to fly.

JOIN AOPA TODAY
Already a member? Sign in